Terry Lierman


It happened again.

One of the least representative states in our union used caucuses, one of the worst possible voting methods, to exert disproportionate influence on determining who will be the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee.

Iowa’s caucus system is inherently flawed and undemocratic. It not only disregards the fundamental principle of one person, one vote, it also requires all voters to publicly announce their preferred candidates, thereby denying them the right to a secret ballot, a concept central to our democracy.

But by far the most troubling aspect of Iowa’s undue influence is that the state, by multiple measures, simply does not reflect the diversity of our country and, even less so, of the Democratic Party.

Iowa, more than 90% Caucasian, is far whiter, more Christian and vastly more rural than the United States as a whole. And to make matters worse, the next primary is held in New Hampshire, which is whiter still.

As the first primary, Iowa holds too much sway over the elections that follow.

Since 1976, nine of the 11 Iowa winners have gone on to win the Democratic Party’s nomination.

But even when Iowa does not pick the ultimate nominee, it does winnow the field. Polling in Iowa significantly impacts whether a candidate can raise sufficient money and garner enough media exposure to be competitive.

Imagine how different — and more diverse — the field might be if the first primary was held in South Carolina, with its significant African American population, or in any other state that more closely mirrors the demographics of the Democratic Party and the nation.

The caucus process also erects obstacles that prevent many Iowans from participating, especially the most vulnerable, rendering the already undemocratic method even less democratic.

I was in Iowa during three presidential caucuses and, each time, I encountered people like the waitress working in a diner who told me she would like to participate but couldn’t get time off work. Caucuses require each voter to be physically present in a designated location for at least two hours.

In addition to ruling out early and absentee voting, this has also, in the past, automatically eliminated members of the military serving out of state and overseas, students attending out-of-state schools and Iowans living or traveling outside the United States.

It’s made participation extremely challenging for night workers (especially those who depend on hourly wages), people with limited access to transportation (not all caucus locations are on bus routes), parents of young children without affordable child care, and the elderly, ill, disabled, home-bound and others who cannot venture out at night or in inclement weather.

Potential voters less fluent in English also face language barriers. Of course, all these challenges disproportionately hinder voters of color, making Iowa caucuses even whiter than the state.

After the 2016 election, the Democratic National Committee asked all 10 states using primary caucuses to switch to poll voting. All but Iowa, Nevada and Wyoming agreed.

It’s not surprising that Iowa’s powers that be didn’t want to alter their state’s process or position: the caucuses grant Iowa far more power and attention from the candidates and also generate significant revenue.

The DNC then required those three states to each create mechanisms for absentee voting.

The Iowa Democratic Party initially proposed virtual caucuses, but the DNC rejected their proposal over legitimate security concerns. Instead, for 2020, the Iowa Democratic Party added 90 satellite caucus sites for Iowa voters across the state country and world. Yet, many potential voters were still excluded.

Even if all the aforementioned challenges were to be addressed, Iowa’s disproportionate influence still remains a problem because of the state’s demographics.

With a population of just more than 3 million, Iowa accounts for 1% of our country’s nearly 330 million people. Why should a small fraction of this 1% repeatedly get more say in who the Democratic nominee is than Democrats in the rest of the country?

On Monday night, the debacle in Iowa proved these points far better than I ever could.

One possible solution is for the DNC to divide the country into five or six regions and hold regional voting primaries — not caucuses — in an order determined by lottery well in advance of each presidential primary season.

There are other viable solutions, including determining the primary order with a lottery of all 50 states. The bottom line is the DNC needs to stand up to Iowa now and find a better, fairer and more representative way to pick our nominee well in advance of 2024.

Terry Lierman is the former chair of the Maryland Democratic Party and a former member of the DNC Executive Committee. He can be reached at terry@liermanadvisors.com.


(11) comments


It is so, more like extreme tunnel vision: one's head's so far up "gi-gi' one can see narrowly, only via eurethra.

Sort of like most pols...election suddenly makes them sooo smart, like potUS, Pompeo, Miller, Drazkowski or our liberal golfer Pelowski, or city council people...

We are prey...as long as the pols hold the reins.

Mr. J...review comments...can't handle your own type of response ('cept these facts are not "alternate truths" or bullroar, which seems to have quieted of late from every where 'cept our leader genius tweety-bird!)


Hive, it's always convenient how republicans will always put their fingers in their ears, head in the sand to not believe things that are indisputable facts. While at the same time believing in other things that are completely made up to fit their paradigm. Religion being the prime example.


Who here said anything about hacked elections?


What nation hacked elections and what party and state was hacked by them. Facts, not bull.


Seems like Democrats have a hard time with technology. Remember the Obamacare website? It was so bad that only 6 people could buy insurance on the first day it launched. Now they want to come back and tank the economy.


J-boy should try a J-Boy! Might add some thing to improve his lot as in more fun.


Maybe so, and maybe just go back to being "Iowan." After all, this entire fiasco is citizen borne, including inability to fence the app.


Well at least we have two pro-cannabis political parties in Minnesota that have spots on the state ballot.

The Grassroots-Legalize Cannabis Party and the Legal Marijuana Now Party. Mr. jdinifinity3, could you shift out why we need two Pot Parties and what the differences are?


No, they need to abolish the entire system, do what they do in Europe.

Have proportional representation with FPP, and actually have more than 2 parties represented in Congress at the State and Federal level.

U wonder why people are so stupid and ignorant in America? It's because our own political system is set up to be 'black' or 'white'. The world doesn't work that way. And hence, why we don't see the world nearly as well as other people do in other advanced nations.


And, do not forget, Lee is located in Davenport, IA!


IA is just early. 45 worthy...a claim to fame but bland...just too long in, IMO. So we do not pay attention.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.