{{featured_button_text}}

If there’s one thing that elite opinion tends to agree about on the left and the right, it’s that nationalism is a very bad thing.

If anything, this view has become even more entrenched as nationalism has demonstrated its potency in recent years, from the election of Donald Trump to Britain’s vote to leave the European Union.

When President Trump first openly embraced the term “nationalist” at a 2018 campaign rally, commentators reacted in horror.

Patriotism is about love, nationalism about hate, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof opined. Trump, insisted Jennifer Rubin of The Washington Post, is “normalizing a hateful political philosophy that is contrary to our deepest-held beliefs.”

As I write in my new book, “The Case for Nationalism,” this reflexive hostility to the concept is ill-informed and an attempt to deem nationalism a swear word and end all discussion on that basis.

At its most basic, the scholar Azar Gat writes, nationalism is “the doctrine and ideology that a people is bound together in solidarity, fate and common political aspirations.” Historian Anthony Smith described the national ideal as “a belief that all those who shared a common history and culture should be autonomous, united and distinct in their recognized homelands.”

A key contention of nationalism is that a nation has its rights and claims. This is a thread that runs through the Declaration of Independence, the Gettysburg Address and the Atlantic Charter. A nation has the right to break off from larger sovereignties in the cause of self-determination (see, for instance, 1776), and to remake its regime or foundational governing rules (see, for instance, 1789).

So if a nation’s rights and interests are being trampled, loyalty to the nation, i.e., nationalism, may require treason against the government, the object of patriotic loyalty. As Michael Lind explains, “Governments should serve nations, not nations governments.”

When Europe went off the rails in the early 20th century, nationalism as such didn’t cause its crash so much as social Darwinism, militarism and the cult of charismatic leadership. The aftermath of World War I added its own poison.

Register for more free articles
Stay logged in to skip the surveys

Regardless, American nationalism — which encompasses such diverse, rightly beloved figures as Alexander Hamilton, Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt — is not to be feared. As with so many other things about this country, it is more benign than the versions to be found in Europe and other places around the world.

This is true for a number of reasons. First, we are the inheritors of an Anglo-American tradition that has profound respect for the individual and the rule of law and is a fundamental part of our national identity.

The sheet anchor of American sovereignty, the U.S. Constitution, makes it clear that authority ultimately resides with “we the people of the United States.” The Constitution also happens to be a durable mechanism of self-government and itself an object of patriotic loyalty and national pride.

Finally, the United States was never infected with the dream of universal empire that Europe inherited from Rome and that has lingered on in differing forms from Charlemagne to the European Union.

The rise of Donald Trump has pushed the left further away from respect for nationalistic attitudes and even patriotic symbols. Democrats — and the country — would be much better served if they countered Trump’s nationalism with a version of their own.

On his own side of the aisle, Trump has made Republicans more nationalistic. Still, much of the party is quietly uncomfortable with this.

If Trump loses in 2020, the party’s establishment may try to snap back to its pre-Trump disposition of relative indifference to nationalism.

Yet, if there’s one clear political lesson from the long history of nationalism in this country and elsewhere, it is that a party interested in moving people and selling a program should make some sort of an appeal to it — even if conventional wisdom insists it is foolish and wrong.

Get News Alerts delivered directly to you.

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Rich Lowry is on Twitter @RichLowry.

0
0
0
0
0

(4) comments

Hive

The problem liberals face is vacuous message. Conservatives are lying, but...

Liberals fear talking about truth, but say crappola! Elections are based on voter wants, not needs. Learn what is needed...and speak it!

Hive

American Democracy, if the People are involved, is truly non-zero sum..."involved" is key, simple...save individual differences!!!

jdinfinity

Lowry is an idiot. He makes Cal Thomas look good which is beyond sad..

Patriotism is for everyone with pride in their country. Nationalism is only for those who it deems fit. Note this part,

"First, we are the inheritors of an Anglo-American tradition that has profound respect for the individual" - Lowry Read between the lines. Entitled, exceptionalist sentiments of white hate that fuel the nationalist fire, obfuscated and made like a sales pitch. No mention of collective immigration, melting pot, just the roots one wants to embodied, not the others...

Also another bogus point,

"So if a nation’s rights and interests are being trampled, loyalty to the nation, i.e., nationalism, may require treason against the government, the object of patriotic loyalty." -Lowry

This is where it goes wrong. Where Lowry is an idiot. Where Voltaire rolls over in his grave. That exceptionalist attitude, that disallows for the slandering of government under the mandates of free speech. The seeds of oppression are planted here, and the trees that grow, hang men from them...

"The rise of Donald Trump has pushed the left further away from respect for nationalistic attitudes and even patriotic symbols. Democrats — and the country — would be much better served if they countered Trump’s nationalism with a version of their own." -Lowry

No, because people on the left understand that hate, no matter what form or where it comes from, is derived from ignorance that divides rather than unites. Intellects know where those paths lead. The right is too blinded by arrogance and nationalist hooplah bullroar to take heed.

Overall. As has been argued numerous times before by intellect of like minds. Nationalism = 0 sum. Patriotism = Cooperative, in it together.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa5shaaC5pM

Hive

Lowry is selling.

People believe "...nationalism is a very bad thing." It can be worse. It is becomes evil, the moment the first brickbat is picked up.

What a tangled web we weave, when we practice to deceive. (W. Raleigh; middle ages) As POTUS and pols show us daily.) Let us pray lazy, apathetic America is waking and most liars will have to do day-jobs, while facing the simple truth, or will America's worst fears persist?

Simple is best!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.