{{featured_button_text}}

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Health insurance premiums for Minnesota residents buying coverage through MNsure or directly from providers will increase by as much as 49 percent on average next year, state officials announced Thursday, a major jump that the state’s top insurance regulator said calls for additional reforms to control costs.

The cost increases for 2016 range from 14 percent for enrollees on a Medica plan to a 49 percent hike for customers on Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, the state’s largest insurer. All eight companies selling insurance on the individual market posted double-digit percentage rate increases for next year.

Most Minnesotans won’t feel the hit — less than 6 percent of residents buy insurance on the individual market, compared to more than 80 percent who are covered through employers or on public programs. But the individual market is at the heart of President Barack Obama’s health care law and the health insurance exchanges such as MNsure it gave way to.

Minnesota Department of Commerce Commissioner Mike Rothman called the increases “unacceptably high.” He said they were driven by a smaller, higher-cost pool of consumers than initially projected — a sentiment echoed by health care experts and the insurers themselves who have suggested prior years’ rates were too low.

“We had rates that were not appropriate,” said Danette Coleman, Medica’s senior vice president for individual business. “Rates that we’re starting to see now really are more reflective of the risk that exists in the individual market.”

Gov. Mark Dayton, Rothman and others pitched MNsure and its allure of subsidies for coverage as a possible fix, but just one-sixth of consumers on the individual market are currently buying coverage through the exchange. Others shop through agents or from the companies directly. MNsure’s Interim Chief Executive Officer Allison O’Toole said the financial help available through the exchange could offset the premium hikes in some cases.

“The spinmeisters who want to trash MNsure, who want to trash Democrats, who want to trash Obamacare or whatever you want to call it, they will attribute the rate hikes to MNsure somehow,” said Rep. Joe Atkins, a Democrat who sponsored the bill creating the state exchange. “The only place you will see a reduction in those outrageous rates that were released across the individual market ... is MNsure.”

Combined with last year’s smaller increase and the exit of the largest insurers from MNsure last year, critics pegged Thursday’s rate hike release as an ominous sign that health care overhaul is faltering in Minnesota. Republican House Speaker Kurt Daudt said GOP lawmakers would renew an attempt to abolish MNsure and move to the federal marketplace next year, though it’s unclear whether that would have any impact on rates in Minnesota.

“It has not lived up to even the most conservative estimates,” Daudt said, citing both registration numbers and initial promises of cost savings under MNsure. “For some reason in Minnesota, the Dayton administration just can’t admit this is failing.”

Others see further signs of trouble beyond next year.

Re-insurance dollars that flow from the federal government to providers will dry up at the end of 2016, leaving insurers with a larger bill for sicker customers, said Heidi Michaels Mathson, president of the Minnesota Association of Health Underwriters. And as prices rise, more consumers and employers may migrate back to group coverage, exacerbating the problem by shrinking the individual market pool.

“I think it will be something similar to what we’re seeing this year,” she said of price hikes in 2017.

Get the latest local news delivered daily directly to your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.
0
0
0
0
0

(5) comments

Sampson

Now we can all sit around and act surprised..... everyone knew this would happen as a result of the ACH. The people who claimed (during ACH debates) that this increases would be offset by savings from more preventative care were blowing smoke. Anyone who believed them was incredibly naive.

justareader

Wonder what the total cost per insured is now?

RES

Interesting that the first reaction to higher cost is more regulations, seems to be an ongoing upward spiral? The old addage of one horse pulling a wagon too slow, answer is to add three more drivers with whips on the same one horse wagon??

Dub

They didn't see this coming because their head was in the sand. . . . . .

Doc2013

Cheers for the Affordable Healthcare Act!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.