There is a newly created year-round school housed in the Hamilton Elementary in La Crosse.

It didn't take long to realize the energy and passion the principal has for his two jobs at Hamilton Elementary, near Gundersen Lutheran.  He serves as principal for the two schools housed in one building -- the SOTA (School of Technology and Arts) and the newly formed year-round school.  One is a charter school and the other is a choice school, and both are part of the public school district.

The year-round  45-15 school calendar, which does not increase the number of school days, but rather spreads out the learning days across the calendar year and enables  remediation or enrichment during the 15 days off.

My conversation with this principal has re-enforced the belief that Minnesota's politicians have developed a wasteful charter school system that splinters our tax dollars and duplicates services -- all at a loss for the taxpayer and eventually for our students.

I believe Minnesota's charter system results in too many additional administrators and support personnel, loss of flexibility in personnel management, decreased public accountability, ineffective use of floor space and much more.

Was it Minnesota's reasoning in the 1990s that the creation of a separate system of charter schools would bring about instructional innovation and increased student achievement? I think so, and some of this has happened within the charters, but certainly not to the degree expected.

Was it our state leaders' plan in the 1990s to encourage public school districts to innovate for the purpose of enhancing student achievement?  I believe so, but change can come very slowly in some situations where adult needs are placed before student needs.

All of this comes full circle when we understand what the La Crosse Public School System is able to accomplish because of its innovations. Coming together for the welfare of all children, resources are put to work in an effective and creative way, the Hamilton Elementary way, a choice school and a charter school sharing one principal, one office, one support staff, one specialist staff, and one building, but each with its own set of classroom teachers, and each with its own separate system of delivering instruction.

Is this what should or could happen here in Winona? Could our charters and District 861 forge an alliance to create a district similar to what La Crosse experiences? Through cost savings, would we be better able to deliver diverse educational opportunities, such as year-round school to our families?

Should this be the next chapter of educational reform for all of Minnesota?  When we do what is right for our children, we will also be doing what is right for adults. 

Jeanne Nelson is a member of the Winona Area Public Schools board.

(3) comments

Leslie Hittner
Leslie Hittner

Jeanne, I was with you until your discussion of a year-round school turned into a tirade about Minnesota charter schools and shared principals. These are separate issues. ISD861 can create year-round schools whether or not there are nearby charters.

There are issues with Minnesota charter schools - especially with respect to recent efforts by legislators and MDE to make them look more and more like "regular" school districts. That being the case, I am not surprised that charters have had a difficult time bringing about "instructional innovation and increased student achievement." They are being pushed into the same cookie cutter approach to education that regular school districts have been dealing with for years.

But I digress. ISD861 has had "shared" principals for years. No, Winona's charter schools and the number of shared principals in the district are not the reason that the Winona Area Public Schools do not have a year-round program. The real reason lies elsewhere.

Jeanne, in my opinion you are one of the most knowledgeable and clear-thinking members of the Winona School Board. Please drop your personal vendetta against charters.

You might just get the cooperation that you are looking for.


Jeanne you're on the school board, why don't you get it done rather than just jump from one pet peeve to another. First it was STEM, which the board before you set up, then it was pre-school and now it's year round school. Sometimes I think you just like a topic so you can hear yourself talk. Quit talking and do something.


Les and CanoeJunkie +1.

And, the kids from charter and parochial schools dress properly when attending and can (actually) read, write and do basic math when they finish...but there is more to the problem than the Nelson's of the education world, right?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.