Click here to view Winona Area Weather
Home > Jimgalewski > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Friday, July 18, 2008
POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (12 comment(s))

Superintendent’s spin doesn’t change the numbers

.
Winona Area Public Schools Superintendent Paul Durand gave us a six-figure answer for why the school district spent $133,000 in legal fees the past two years.

It’s an alarming figure and Durand tempered the number by pointing out the district is a $49 million a year business with more than 700 employees, serving thousands of families. In such a large operation Durand says we should expect some legal fees. He’s right, and the news story pointed out the legal fees spent in other school districts.
There are a number of places to put blame if we are looking for a cause. It can also be argued that the board shouldn’t roll over and play dead at every grievance. My question is: Are we winning or losing these grievances?

I don’t think we want to see what the district’s track record is for grievances the district has paid legal fees to defend and lost anyway. Which administrators are causing these grievances and could they have been resolved in a less contentious and less expensive way?

Let’s see how we can achieve some harmony and mutual respect between the administration and its employees. I can almost assure you peaceful resolutions are less costly and not as hurtful. It’s not realistic to think the district wouldn’t ever have a grievance it had to defend. It would be nice if grievances were rare and seldom lost.

We have a choice for school board

Of all the elections coming up this fall, I am most concerned about who would run for the Winona Area Public School Board.

I don’t think our presidential candidates offer us much. Neither will bring about change even though both promise it. Our local school board makes some very important decisions on how we spend about $49 million on our local schools. I was pleased to see we will have a choice in every school board position. Being willing to serve on the school board is a very high degree of public service. The hours are long and the pay is awful. School board members collect $90 a month. That’s barely $1,000 a year for long meetings and dozens of appearances each month. Then there are the phone calls at home from just about anybody. The chairperson of the board gets double that pay, but four times the headache. On top of all that, folks like me criticize your hard work and slam your name around like you just shot the family dog.

We should be thankful we have people willing to work to improve our local schools. It’s not an easy job. Public education has a lot of problems. Just like the auto makers and airlines, public education in Minnesota has a lot of baggage — state mandates, teacher unions and accounting practices that would make a Philadelphia lawyer’s head spin. I’m thankful to every school board candidate who has put her or his name on the ballot. Having a choice can only mean the best for our local schools.

Where were you when the Wilkie was razed?

That’s a question you won’t hear often. We weren’t surprised by the decision of the Winona City Council to vote to tear down the steamboat museum. The council delayed the decision for more than a year.

When it came time to vote to raze the structure, there were only two options to remove the building and leave foundation.

The low bidder for that much work was Winona Mechanical for $43,477. The other option was to take the building and the foundation. That low bid was from Tom Baures Excavating for $80,245. Working from memory, I gave Tim Breza the only credit for saving a little money and removing the building and the foundation. Council member Debbie White directed me to the June 2 minutes where both she and Breza voted against just removing just the building.

Council members Al Thurley, James Kahl, Deb Salyards, George Borzyskowski and Mayor Jerry Miller voted in favor of holding off on removing the foundation. The point I was trying to make was what little good a foundation would be for a fake boat.

By working off memory on the council vote, I proved my memory leaks as badly as the roof of the Wilkie. Neither fact should be much of a surprise.

Galewski is the retired editor and Opinion page editor of the Winona Daily News. His views don’t necessarily reflect the views of the newspaper. If you have an idea or tip about a Winona issue, call Jim at (507) 452-3960. His e-mail is editor@luminet.net.
.
Advertisement
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

El Uno wrote on Jul 22, 2008 7:54 AM:

" WEAK! How was that last comment inappropriate? The commies at WDN are trying to censor El Uno but they will not succeed. I have a dream... "

straighttalk wrote on Jul 20, 2008 11:22 PM:

" JD sounds like a now or former board member.
If Paul Durand would stop putting letters of reprimand in files (or as he stated in an article, letters of direction)of teachers with no cause but his own agenda there would not have to be so many grievances. Mr Ramsdell is only the WEA co-president and is doing what he has to do to protect the staff he is working for. The person who needs attention is not Mr Ramsdell, but the superintendent. Ask other districts he worked in. "

WeThePeople wrote on Jul 20, 2008 8:42 PM:

" Troller, I think they're jealous. Again, your points are well said and simple. The average citizen can't or won't think in terms of "truth". "

Troller wrote on Jul 20, 2008 10:08 AM:

" Well, I'd love to talk some employees, ( I don't know any) perhaps some are reading this page. But I'd like to hear from someone who currently works there, as opposed to a former employee as the individual may have an agenda. My apologies for taking this away from the point of the original article. I agree, Durand needs to look for work elsewhere. Other school districts in this area manage to function year to year with a lot less hassle. "

ssnuffy wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:30 AM:

" And onceagain, allwe do is complain . when will it be enough to form some sort of committee to run this guy out??? "

xfs-123 wrote on Jul 19, 2008 4:00 PM:

" El Uno - We'd make a heck of a team, eh!?

Troller-you need to actually talk with people that work there, as I have. Talk with long term office people and the sales people. "

Troller wrote on Jul 18, 2008 8:06 PM:

" FAST's balance sheet shows they are operating debt free, growing over 15% per year. And you tell me they manage this while giving employees good reason to look for work elsewhere? Are there no "skilled" jobs at FAST, are they all line workers? If so, why isn't FAST experiencing a mass departure of employees? I mean if they took away benefits, cut the pay, and whatever "barely legal" stuff you tell me FAST is pulling, how is all of this escaping market analysts? Or am I just biting into another "Winona, let 'em eat cake" conspiracy theory? Not one damn thing either of you has posted makes any sense. Give some proof, I'll sell off my FAST stock on Monday. So which one of you went to school to create teaching jobs, you never did answer? "

Troller wrote on Jul 18, 2008 7:57 PM:

" Hey guys, how about some examples of this unethical, nearly illegal, behavior? When, and how much did FAST cut employee's wages? What jobs were eliminated, what benefits were cut? I see some very strong opinions here but barring any real examples (dates, times, places, who, what, where, how) so far all either of you has done is cast allegations. Is there somewhere I can go to follow up? As I said before, profit = employees, not, employees = profit. If you think I jest, check in with Starbucks, GM, Northwest Airline and the list goes on and on. "

J.D. wrote on Jul 18, 2008 1:46 PM:

" Unfortunately you cannot blame Durand for the legal fees. Look at Bruce Ramsdell and all the idiotic grievances he has filed on behalf of the teachers union. Durand is just defending his "business" which is what running a school is, a business. You have a budget, employees, payroll, sounds like a business to me. If you were to get rid of all the grievances that Ramsdell filed, you would see our District legal fees go down tremendously. I say keep Durand and let him do his job and get rid of Ramsdell and watch the difference in the teachers attitudes without someone getting them all worked up as well as the legal fees for arbitration which he has created. I used to believe Durand was at fault, but not anymore, he is just the one who takes all the heat because he is the "President". "

El Uno wrote on Jul 18, 2008 11:22 AM:

" I'm with my Mayoral running mate xfs here...Fastenal, for all their financial "success", is a pretty shady organization. They use MANY business practices that aren't quite illegal, but HIGHLY unethical. "

xfs-123 wrote on Jul 18, 2008 10:00 AM:

" Is there any question that the school district would be much farther ahead without Durand?

Is there any question that Fastenal makes there shareholders happy by cutting pay, reducing benefits and eliminating jobs but not management jobs JUST TO SHOW A GOOD PROFIT MARGIN? Unlike the school district, this company is NOT in financial trouble, they just want to impress shareholders. "

Troller wrote on Jul 18, 2008 7:12 AM:

" {Durand tempered the number by pointing out the district is a $49 million a year business with more than 700 employees} Point of order Mr. Durand, the school system is NOT a business, it's more akin to a GOVERNMENT PROGRAM! And like most government programs, it's a money pit, sucking up taxpayer's hard earned dollars, in good economies and bad. Perhaps Winona should put the Fastenal management team in charge of the school system, provided they want it to run like a "business". Ahh, but then we'd have miserable employees, not the happy crew currently teaching there now. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Winona Daily News.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post. Send comments to jerome.christenson@lee.net

We reserve the right not to post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
Log In - If you have already signed up with winonadailynews.com, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, winonadailynews.com requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

WINONA JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises
Minnesota Farm Guide

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The Winona Daily News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.