Click here to view Winona Area Weather
Home > Jerome > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Tuesday, May 13, 2008
POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (23 comment(s))

We are the ones who are responsible

.
Sorry John, sorry Hill; it’ll take more than $2.22 to buy my vote.

That’s the current bid anyway … at 18.5 cents a gallon, that’s what McCain and Clinton would save me on a tank of gas for the family car by giving us a “federal gas tax holiday” for the summer — maybe even all the way up to — oh, say — Election Day.
Sorry, folks, I’m not buying — or selling — but I might just take a moment to lay some blame. If you want to see who’s responsible for these outrageous gas prices go home and look in the mirror. Or blame your mother … your uncle … the fool living up the street … the goombah newspaper columnist who has three cars and is too dead-butt lazy to take a half-hour to walk to work. Sorry folks, if there’s finger pointing to do we’d best be pointing them at ourselves — the classic cocked-thumb, index finger to the temple pose being particularly appropriate.

We got ourselves into this mess and no amount of two-bit political pandering is going to get us out. The party’s over — we may not have hit the bottom of the barrel, but we’re getting close. We’ve spent a century swilling gas like freshmen at a frat party and we’re seeing the dawn of the morning after the night before. Our great national hangover is upon us, and like any hangover, there’s no choice but to suffer it out.

Yeah, I was right out there among ’em. I grew up with gas wars — 17.5 cents a gallon — and a set of drinking glasses with every fill. By high school, “Two bucks, regular” was the price of an evening’s socializing, maybe even a little romance. If cheap gas wasn’t our birthright, we surely didn’t know it. Civics class contrasted the wide-empty avenues in Moscow with traffic jams in LA to prove that it truly would be better dead than red.

Sure, there were a couple of hiccups back in the ’70s — but that was OPEC’s doing, and once we taught those (insert favorite middle-eastern ethnic slur here) a thing or two everything would be hunky-dory and Mr. Carter’s malaise would vanish like a puff of exhaust in a clear blue sky.

But somehow, while we were building freeways, closing up rail depots and shutting down bus lines, nobody mentioned that while we pumped more and more oil out of the ground, nobody but the Good Lord and Father Time could put any more back in. Now, all over the world oil wells are starting to suck and skrirkle like soda straws bottoming out a malted milk, and try as we might, we can’t find the fine print in either the Constitution or the Bill of Rights that guarantees our right to cheap gas.

It is sort of funny. The same free market that some people tell us is such a great thing when it prices poor folks out of the doctor’s office, turns into so many price-gouging profiteers in need of government regulation when the gas pump spins like a Las Vegas slot while they fill the tank on their $50,000 Denali. C’mon, it’s the same Black Gold, Texas T, that made Jed a millionaire — and if the folks pumping it can’t make enough to keep up their homes “in the hills of Beverly” they’ll bail out of the business — and since they’re the only folks making the gas — we’ll be in an even bigger fix.

And blaming the gub’mint gets a guy no further. The state of Minnesota boosted the gas tax by 2 cents a month ago, but Kwik Trip jacked it by a dime this morning. Can’t blame the station either when the price of a barrel of crude topped $120 with no end in sight.

Of course, the only reason we know about any of this is that we’re parked at the pump watching the dollars drain out of our debit cards.

Sorry to say, there’s no quick fix, happy ending here. Remember when two bucks a gallon was outrageous. … It won’t be long, and these will be the good ol’ days. Enjoy ’em.

Oh, in time it will get better. Folks lived well and got around just fine before gasoline automobiles, and things will be just fine when they’re so much scrap metal and memories. Just how we’ll manage it, I’m not set to say, but I’m pretty sure getting there will be a rough road, and we may as well get the trip under way. It’s just going to cost more if we wait.

And no tax holiday is going to change that.

Contact Jerome Christenson at (507) 453-3500 or jchristenson@winonadailynews.com.
.
Advertisement
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

The Donald wrote on May 19, 2008 3:35 PM:

" While constrained refinery capacity due to unscheduled maintenance (accidents, storms, etc.) can cause price spikes, over the long term expansion and technology upgrades of existing facilities has been sufficient to process the available supplies. Why would the industry want to build new plants if its more economical to improve existing ones? Keep in mind that Bush, in the last State of the Union address called for reducing our national gasoline consumption by 20%. Not much of an incentive for corporate investment in building new ones.

And if refining capacity was really a bottleneck now, does it make any sense for Bush to be over begging the Saudis to increase their export of crude?
"

Jack Sparrow wrote on May 15, 2008 9:56 AM:

" Except, that the food prices have very little to do with ethanol, and EVERYTHING to do with fuel prices. "

PerfectStranger wrote on May 14, 2008 6:57 PM:

" Hey, cewoodford, what happened to your pal Troller? "

cewoodford wrote on May 14, 2008 5:40 PM:

" Name calling...how cute, usually the first refuge of failed logic. The Ethanol industry Redbridge...heard of it? Do you like how your food prices have been steadily rising? Let me clue you in, this national problem has NOTHING to do with President Bush and everything to do with a false market created by your elected officials under the guise of some misguided green/eco-friendly wave of ignorance. "

redbridge wrote on May 14, 2008 2:56 PM:

" Nobody wants to play wit ce anymore? OK. I'll bite. What is the Great Ethanol Scam, woodshed? I'm pretty sure it must be MY fault, whatever it is.

And in getting back on topic, aren't you even just a little proud of all us idiotic sheep for recognizing Billary and McSame's pandering about a gas-tax holiday? "

cewoodford wrote on May 14, 2008 10:53 AM:

" And nobody here has an opinion on the Great Ethanol Scam? "

cewoodford wrote on May 14, 2008 10:51 AM:

" Furthermore, I'm not parroting ANYONE, the expansion of our refinieries DID NOT and HAS NOT kept up with demand. To infer the "expansions" have done this is a blatant lie and misrepresentation of FACTS Donald. Did that "expansion" help us when Katrina swept through the gulf coast? HELL NO, why you "environmentalists" think its okay to put a stranglehold on US refineries is BEYOND my feeble conservative mind.. PLease answer then, WHY NO NEW REFINERIES??????? "

cewoodford wrote on May 14, 2008 10:47 AM:

" El Uno, sure I can, it is and was the same flock mentality thinking people that have you believeing you should be buying carbon offsets from their leaders companies...who conveniently happen to sell them. Wake up buddy, dont be a sheep. 20yrs ago I knew these plastic bags were NO GOOD, we were told we didnt care about Mother Earth if we used paper..hmmm..looks like those views have changed as well, much like the arrogance and hypocrisy of Algore and his inconvenient truth... "

The Donald wrote on May 13, 2008 3:50 PM:

" Those who parrot the no new refineries ranting point never mention that existing ones have expanded and have kept up with demand. Sort of related to this is the charge that oil companies have been trying to inhibit alternative fuel initiatives. If they really wanted to, then in conjunction with OPEC, supplies could be manipulated to keep retail prices periodically low enough to make alternate fuel investments look too risky. Any opinions on why they are not doing so? "

El Uno wrote on May 13, 2008 2:43 PM:

" Nobody can hold a grudge like cewoodford. You must have a very interesting life if you can remember who looked at you funny 20 years ago... Shine on buddy! "

cewoodford wrote on May 13, 2008 11:21 AM:

" and some of youe SAME idiots protesting the "bio-degradable" plastic bags are the SAME idiots who looked at me funny back in the late 80's when I would choose to go with paper at the grocery store. "

cewoodford wrote on May 13, 2008 11:19 AM:

" Hey..you want to have cheaper gas? How about building a few more refineries? That is the answer. Instead we run a wrecking ball through our economy in the form of the Great Ethanol Scam. I'd li8ke to know how many elected officals are financially invested in the Ethanol Scam. "

El Uno wrote on May 13, 2008 8:29 AM:

" CaptnTony - Ok then explain to me how increased demand/consumption would not lower the supply on a non-renewable good? I guess if technology explodes and we somehow discover and implement and entirely new system to produce gasoline by the end of the summer you would be right, otherwise try again. "

really? wrote on May 12, 2008 7:43 PM:

" No one said we don't need oil, only that we have enough. I understand that oil is in everything from plastic bags (we should ban them like California) to laundry bottles. We have other options!

Watch "Who killed the electric car", it is a more thorough telling of the electric car story. The battery technology is here. I don't buy the pricing argument you raised. I saw an electric car at the Living Green Expo in St. Paul last week for $17,000.

And the electricity? 100% of mine comes from wind power. "

CaptnTony wrote on May 12, 2008 4:33 PM:

" really?, I did a little search on our favorite search engine to see why GM "really" stopped producing the electric vehicles. I found some interesting information. It doesn't seem like the reason for dumping the entire line of vehicles (as did all the other major manufacturers) IS because we're waiting for the technology! Batteries to store the electricity to get me from point A to somewhere more than 100miles away! A model that allows these vehicles to be priced competitively (you do understand that the electic companies are already telling you to conserve electricity right? Or we have to build more coal fired plants and/or nuclear and/or find someone willing to host wind farms (not an easy task)).

nice read:
http://www.motorists.org/ericpeters/september-2007/shocking-price-of-electric-cars/ "

CaptnTony wrote on May 12, 2008 4:23 PM:

" re: really?

Um, we don't need oil? Think plastics. Think lubricants for machines that run the industrial markets. Think asphalt (which MN needs a lot more of at this time). Here's a site where even 4th graders can come up with a few things oils is needed for (outside of gasoline):

http://www.saskschools.ca/~carnduffelem/oilpages/uses.htm "

CaptnTony wrote on May 12, 2008 4:06 PM:

" El Uno, I need to point out a small flaw in your rationalization. In a free market economy (or as close as the politicians will let us get to it here in the US), an increased demand does not equate to a supply drop. Nor, does a supply drop necessarily mean a price increase. One must at least try to understand the market economy before pontificating and proclaiming to be able to quote 'I just explained supply and demand...'. For a good read see: http://www.investopedia.com/university/economics/economics3.asp "

really? wrote on May 9, 2008 12:11 AM:

" We do have all the oil we need~ The truth is we don't need it. Ask GM why the crushed their entire fleet of electric cars. We aren't waiting for the technology, it's already here and it's been wiped out! And we can greatly reduce our use of coal. We have all the wind we need for electricity. There are no more excuses for not being informed. "

El Uno wrote on May 8, 2008 1:00 PM:

" If anyone has a death grip on our politicians it's the oil industry which has stifled the research and production of alternate fuels sources for close to 30 YEARS!!!! I'm trying to remember the name of a greedy, corrupt, moron who has strong ties to the oil industry and somehow sat in the highest position of our government for more than 7 years while the country crumbled around him...... what was his name?!?!?!? "

El Uno wrote on May 8, 2008 7:50 AM:

" Rawhide, I just explained supply and demand and then went on to say I was voting for a Democrat. We have all the oil we'll ever need?? Please explain where that information comes from. "

Rawhide wrote on May 7, 2008 6:40 PM:

" What??? Is there even one democrat that has ever heard of "supply and demand"? This country has all fo the oil it will ever need, but when the evironmental lobby has a death grip on our politicians, particularly democrats, the blame can be placed right on their shoulders. This movement is a religion to its practioners, plain and simple. We have not gotten the oil we know we have, and the oil companies have not be one new refinery in almost 30 years. We have not built any nuclear plants which would greatly reduce our need for oil and coal. Wake up folks! "

El Uno wrote on May 7, 2008 12:33 PM:

" If you lower the gas prices, it will raise demand. If demand is raised, supply will drop. If supply drops, prices will go up. Wow..... I was on the fence about Hillary and John, this issue has knocked me off. Bring it on home, Obama. "

The Donald wrote on May 7, 2008 7:26 AM:

" It has been pointed out that implicit in the gas tax holiday scheme was that someone would have to eventually tell the American public that the holiday was over. I wonder which politician would want to take that on. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Winona Daily News.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post. Send comments to jerome.christenson@lee.net

We reserve the right not to post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
Log In - If you have already signed up with winonadailynews.com, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, winonadailynews.com requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

WINONA JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises
Minnesota Farm Guide

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The Winona Daily News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.