Click here to view Winona Area Weather
Home > Opinion > Others Views > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Monday, April 28, 2008
POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (5 comment(s))

Corporate welfare, Winona style

.
Winona City Council’s consideration of a request for Tax Increment Financing to help the developer build the 42-unit cooperative housing project Applewood Pointe raises the question of when and under what conditions government should provide the means for making the ventures of private businesses profitable.

United Properties, one of Minnesota’s largest developers, will receive public money in the amount of approximately “$489,000 in construction costs, including land acquisition and improvements to the building site,” according to a March 31 news report in the Winona Daily News.
What justifies using money received from taxpayers to make a private corporation’s business venture profitable? The argument is that the Applewood Pointe complex will provide for Winona more much-needed housing suitable for seniors who want to be free of the snow shoveling, lawn mowing and other maintenance requirements of single-family home ownership. Since the land on which the facility would be built is currently owned by a church organization that does not pay property taxes, the development would add to the tax base. Another developer, who did not seek TIF money, had to abandon the project allegedly because it would not have been a good business venture in the absence of a public subsidy.

Using public funding to make this private business venture profitable would be only a tiny example in terms of dollars of a practice that has been called “corporate welfare.” The council’s deliberations come shortly after publication of journalist David Cay Johnston’s new book, “Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You with the Bill).”

As the subtitle indicates, government, especially at the federal level, through direct subsidies or elimination or nonenforcement of regulations, has used millions, and sometimes even billions, of tax dollars, collected from you and me, to enable the business ventures of the wealthiest Americans and largest corporations to be unbelievably profitable.

Consider four examples that Johnston documents in detail. When corporate executives use company jet airplanes for personal trips, they do not reimburse their employers. The corporation deducts the costs of purchasing, operating and maintaining the planes as a business expense. The costs of the personal trips are treated as a taxable fringe benefit, like the personal use of a company car. The executive pays pennies on the dollars of the real cost of his personal travel, in the form of higher income tax. The balance is effectively covered by taxes collected from the rest of us, and by those of us who have invested a portion of our retirement savings in his company.

Minnesota-based United Health Group went even further in benefits it gave its former chief executive, William McGuire. Their board of directors agreed to pay his taxes on personal use of corporate jets. Additionally, they agreed to his demands for stock options equal to 2 percent of the value of the company, and a guarantee of continued employment whether he did his job well or poorly. When he was subsequently fired, they had to agree to an exorbitant severance buyout of his contract. United Health Group insures about one out of every six insured Americans, most of them older and on Medicare. Effectively, the insured, United’s stockholders and taxpayers are paying for this billionaire’s lavish retirement life.

Famous investor Warren Buffet has been named the world’s richest person. But much of his wealth was made possible by special tax favors. For example, his MidAmerican Energy Co. paid only 4 percent of its American profits in federal corporate income taxes in 2006, while most middle-income Americans were paying several times that percentage. Buffet was able to do this as a result of laws that enable corporations to defer payment of taxes. MidAmerican deferred $666 million dollars in tax payments in 2007. By 2035, it will have paid only half of that amount. Being allowed to defer tax payments is like getting an interest-free loan from the government, or in other words from other taxpayers.

Wouldn’t you like to have an interest-free mortgage that allowed you to pay only the principle, and most of that only several years from now?

And there are the state and local subsidies for building stadiums given to billionaire professional sports franchise owners who sign multi-million-dollar contracts with athletes. George W. Bush and his group of wealthy investors, who could easily have afforded to build a new stadium, persuaded Arlington voters to approve a half-cent increase in the sales tax to finance the development of the facility and an array of hotels, restaurants, shopping malls and entertainment complexes surrounding it. Then to get 200 acres they wanted, they used eminent domain, which usually results in owners being paid less than market value for their land. Bush and his group eventually bought the stadium for less than a third of what it cost the public to build it.

All of this feeding of the rich at the public trough has contributed to the growing disparity of wealth between the rich and the rest of us. From government tax data, Johnston has determined that the top tenth of 1 percent of Americans ranked by wealth — about 300,000 people — had nearly as much reported income in 2005 as the 150 million Americans who make up the economic lower half of our population. The average annual income of the “vast majority” (270 million) of us actually decreased 3 percent between 1975 and 2005, while the figure for the richest 1 percent increased 209 percent, and for the “superrich” (1/100th of the top 1 percent) it rose by 650 percent during that period.

When President Reagan was inaugurated in 1980, the top tax rate was 70 percent of taxable income. During this period of phenomenal growth in disparity between the incomes of the richest and most of the rest of us since then, the top tax rate has been cut in half, to 35 percent.

The city council’s decision to subsidize United Properties’ Applewood Pointe meant considering whether the consequential increase in the tax burden on Winonans, or resultant limiting of public services, justifies the benefits of increasing the housing stock suitable for seniors.

Stewart Shaw is a former Winona State University registrar who is getting a second education in retirement. He also volunteers for several local organizations.
.
More News:
    Advertisement
     Tell us what you think...

     Comments »

    really? wrote on Apr 28, 2008 11:21 PM:

    " Working for the government does not guarantee you a raise each year. Unions provide an opportunity to negotiate salary and benefits, unlike being at the mercy of "management". I've worked in both worlds. I can tell you that the government is much more frugal than big business. We answer to whiney tax payers.

    Nothing in this piece implies he was at or below poverty level, unless you took "most of the rest of us" to mean that all in America that are not rich are at or below poverty level, including yourself. It's coming to that, but I think it's a bit of a stretch to accuse the writer of implying it.
    "

    Rawhide wrote on Apr 28, 2008 7:25 PM:

    " End all subsidies, whether its for housing, food, or HIGHER EDUCATION! The watch prices fall. Our current situation in America is going to force what our bought and paid for politicians refuse to do... Shrink the federal government! They have only gotten away with all of these taxes and waste because the general population could deal with the small amount of pain they imposed. As gas and food prices rise, lets just see how long congress will wait before eliminating gas taxes and food subsudies! "

    cewoodford wrote on Apr 28, 2008 10:16 AM:

    " Also Mr. Shaw, do you REALLY feel it is fair for the government to take 70% of a persons earnings? What is wrong with a FLAT TAX RATE? That would be the FAIR thing to do. Everyone would pay the same % of their income...that's called equality..Or maybe the Fair Tax(www.fairtax.gov)? Punishing the producers is a fools argument. Increasing the tax BASE, not the tax RATE is the solution. You made your career working for an institution that isnt accountable to a P&L sheet or stock holders. You were given guaranteed raises and such. I cant possibly expect you to understand the economic real world when you were in the WSU cocoon of taxpayer funded comfort. "

    cewoodford wrote on Apr 28, 2008 10:06 AM:

    " Quote-"When President Reagan was inaugurated in 1980, the top tax rate was 70 percent of taxable income. During this period of phenomenal growth in disparity between the incomes of the richest and most of the rest of us since then, the top tax rate has been cut in half, to 35 percent." Are you trying to insinuate that you, a retired registrar from the MNSCU system were at one time living in poverty or that during your career at WSU you were living below the poverty level? To imply that you were disparaged or living a meek existence because of Ronald Reagan is grasping at some of the thinnest straws on the planet. Maybe we should have left the Jew-hating Jimmy Carter in office, Lord knows where we'd be today... "

    cewoodford wrote on Apr 28, 2008 12:26 AM:

    " I agree with you wholeheartedly about Applewoodpoint. The developer needs to charge more per unit. You did however fail to mention that currently the U.S. has one of the highest corporate taxes on the planet. Raising taxes on employers(corporations) and de-incentivizing them to keep jobs in the U.S. certainly isn't the answer to improving the US economy or our governments spending habits. "


    The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Winona Daily News.

     Post a comment (150 word limit) »

    Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post. Send comments to jerome.christenson@lee.net

    We reserve the right not to post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
    Log In - If you have already signed up with winonadailynews.com, please sign in now!
    *Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     
    Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, winonadailynews.com requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

    **Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

    Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

    Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

    *Create a Member ID:
    *Choose a password:
    *Re-enter password:
    *E-mail Address:
    *Year of Birth:
     

    (children under 13 cannot register)

    *First Name:
    *Last Name:
    Company:
    Home Phone:
    Business Phone:
    *Address:
    *City:
    *State:
    *Zip Code:
     

    NEWSPAPER ADS

    WINONA JOBS

    TOP HOMES

     
     
    Dailies
    La Crosse Tribune
    Winona Daily News

    Weeklies
    Coulee News
    The Chronicle
    Holmen Courier
    Houston County News
    Onalaska Life
    Tomah Journal
    Vernon Broadcaster
    Westby Times

    Regional
    Inside Preps
    My LIVE! Entertainment
    Best of River Valley
    Business Report
    Healthy Living Today
    Strictly Golf
    River Valley Bike Trails
    River Valley Blogs
    River Valley Outdoors

    Shoppers
    Tri-County Foxxy

    Marketplace
    Newspaper Ads
    Local Website Directory
    7 Rivers Rentals
    HomeSeller
    Wheels Website
    Work For You

    Portals
    La Crosse NET
    Winona NET

    Classifieds
    River Valley Classifieds

    Links
    Lee Enterprises

    About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
    Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The Winona Daily News. All rights reserved.
    Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.