Click here to view Winona Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Sunday, December 30, 2007
POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (21 comment(s))

Finding home: Family of nine gets little government aid after flood

.
“Listen,” Eric said.

It was 3 a.m., and Eric and Jane Thompson were wide awake in the kitchen of the home that would soon be theirs.
Eric and Jane Thompson and their seven kids, Lily, 4, Grace, 6, Eli, 8, Caleb, 10, Seth, 12, Nick, 13, and Allie, 16, play games in the living room of their Rushford apartment Friday. The family was displaced from their home Aug. 19 by the flood, staying in motels and with friends and relatives until they found an apartment in October. The living room houses Jane's sewing corner, the t.v., computer, toys and games and is also used for dining. The other rooms in the apartment are shared bedrooms, one bathroom and a small kitchen. (Photo by Melissa Carlo/Winona Daily News)

Their seven children slept soundly in the bedrooms of the River Trail Inn in downtown Rushford, Minn.

Homes that accomodate a family of nine are hard to find. The Thompsons thought they had landed one in the River Trail Inn, which has 12 bedrooms and seven-and-a-half bathrooms.

The Thompsons had been renting rooms at the Inn for several weeks. They had a verbal agreement to purchase the building by spring 2008 and convert it into their home and office for their two at-home businesses.

As was the case for so many flood victims, the night of Aug. 18 changed those plans.

“We heard a sound and Eric said: ‘It sounds like a siren going off,’” Jane said.

The Thompsons rounded up their seven children — ages four to 16 — and waded through thigh-deep water to higher ground near Rushford-Peterson High School.

“I made sure I counted heads when we got to the high school,” Jane said.

More than four months later, the Thompsons find caring for their brood is no less of a challenge.

The family has moved 12 times since the disaster.

They first moved to Jane’s parents’ home in Winona. A few days later they left the one-bedroom townhome and headed to Winona’s Riverport Inn.

From there, the Thompsons’ odyssey took them to hotels in Houston, Preston and La Crosse.

But the Thompsons say Rushford is where they need to be.

The customers for their businesses are there. Their friends are there. Eric is a member of the Rushford-Peterson school board.

“We have a purpose in this town,” Jane said.

For the last two months, the family has been staying in a three-bedroom apartment in Rushford.

And no matter where they’ve moved, the Thompsons can’t leave behind their memories of the night of Aug. 18.

Jane said their youngest child — 4-year-old Lily — still chastises Eric to stay indoors every time it rains.

“Don’t open the door, Daddy,” Lily says. “The water will come in.”

Promise of state aid falters

The Thompsons had virtually nothing to their name after the flood. It wiped out most of their personal belongings, including a 15-passenger van that could transport the whole family at once.

Despite their obvious need, the family was turned away from every state program to which they applied.

It left Jane wondering what happened to the promise of September, when the Minnesota Legislature passed a $157 million flood relief bill.

“That money was set up for the people here,” Jane said. “Where is it?”

The Thompsons weren’t homeowners, so they weren’t eligible for Minnesota Quick Start funds.

The Minnesota Investment Fund program offered no help for Eric’s business, Eric’s Lock and Key.

After those rejections, the family contacted Sen. Sharon Erickson Ropes, DFL-Winona. Ropes and other lawmakers have prodded state officials to be more liberal in their disbursement of Quick Start and MIF funds.

Ropes believes she’s identified the technicality that eliminated Eric from consideration for MIF funds. She said Eric and others who were denied the funds on their first try may be eligible if they apply again.

“It’s really important to get the message out: If it didn’t work for you the first time, go back and try again,” she said.

The Thompsons’ applications to the Federal Emergency Management Agency yielded some aid — if a pittance compared to their total losses.

The family was denied a FEMA trailer because they weren’t homeowners, Jane said. The amount they’ve received from FEMA in rental reimbursement: $1,100.

Other safety nets have failed the Thompsons.

They had renter’s insurance, Eric said, but collected nothing in reimbursement because the damage was done by a flood.

The Thompsons acknowledge that state programs have helped some others in Rushford. But watching others get help while they’re left out has Jane wondering why they’ve been passed over.

“The government needs to be accountable for what it hasn’t done,” Jane said.

A home for now

“Welcome,” Jane said, “to the real world of the Thompsons.”

For now, that world is crammed inside a three-bedroom apartment in an upstairs storefront in Rushford.

While it’s far from ideal, Jane said the apartment is the best living space they’ve found so far.

Clothes and appliances clutter the apartment’s narrow hallways. Inside the kitchen, a card table stacked with toasters and utensils is perched in front of the refrigerator.

The table doubles as a cook space for their skillet, where Jane often fries up three to four dozen eggs to feed the family.

“We don’t all fit at the table,” she said dryly.

But the Thompsons have done everything possible to make the place feel like home.

A Christmas tree is the centerpiece of their living room — “one of the prettiest trees I’ve ever had,” Jane said.

The tree and its ornaments all were donated, as was a bunk bed in one of the bedrooms. As were the clothes they’re wearing now. As were the toys their children got for Christmas.

The Thompsons credit groups like Lutheran Disaster Response and the Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation for providing assistance.

“There will never be a way to say ‘thank you’ to everyone who helped,” Jane said.

Yet the Thompsons’ future still holds plenty of unanswered questions.

Most of all, Jane said her family of nine wants room enough to sleep in peace.

“I don’t know what the future holds,” Jane said. “My kids just want a home.”
.



Advertisement
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

UnHappy wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:13 PM:

" the Thompson's are losers, they need jobs to support their large family..they have lost 2 homes to forclosure and they couldnt afford rent in their rental house..so they rented rooms in the B&B..they are failures.. "

UnHappy wrote on Jul 21, 2008 1:03 AM:

" This is the worst story I have ever heard, i will never EVER feel bad for the Thompsons. "

Jacob wrote on Jan 4, 2008 10:04 AM:

" So, you're one of those, too, that believes the world owes you for being alive? It's too bad that you are filled with so much hate and anger and resentment. Such energy could go a long way to making Winona and Rushford a better place. but, don't get me wrong. Renters aren't bad people -- it's not a personal issue. The point is that "owners" have invested in the property underneath the government, whereas renters rely upon the original property owner. Everyone has a choice as to how and where to live -- no one forces you to make that choice. When you make that choice, you get the consequences. Just because you don't like the consequences doesn't mean they are wrong -- just means you don't like it. "

wsutowniealum wrote on Jan 3, 2008 8:43 PM:

" To Jane & Eric-don't listen to these misguided people. They don't know that you are intelligent, loving parents that planned to have a large family. Most of the people coming down on you probably had their children by accident, which is incredibly sad. Winona truly is a town without pity. (p.s. I was a classmate of Jane's at the now defunct Winona Christian School, init: L.S.) "

wsutowniealum wrote on Jan 3, 2008 8:30 PM:

" That's right, all of us that rent are merely unmotivated and afraid of commitment. We also are able to pick up & move if we don't like the neighborhood, aren't tied down to a 30 year mortgage we can't afford, don't pay thousands of dollars of property taxes each year, don't have to pay to replace the water heater if it goes out, don't have to mow the lawn or shovel snow...What have we been thinking!
If "Jacob's" house ever burns down, I don't think he will generate much sympathy while he stands on the rubble he owns proclaiming his superiority to the renters up the block.
"

Jacob wrote on Jan 3, 2008 3:14 PM:

" Besides, a renter has invested trust in the property owner. The real question for you is why is the original property owner not taking advantage of the government assistance in order to return the rental back to a condition that would allow you to continue with the plan? Again, homeowners have choices, while renters do not -- it's not unfair because they've taken upon themselves the risk for owning and maintaining property. "

Jacob wrote on Jan 3, 2008 2:28 PM:

" Seems to me there is a huge difference between a homeowner and a renter. A homeowner is committed to paying a long-term debt and long-term tax obligation, while a renter has basically no committments. The homeowner has his own property at stake, while the renter just has his own possessions. The details about your family are sad, to be sure, but whether there are 7 kids or no kids, renters don't deserve the same treatment as homeowners. "

jetpac wrote on Jan 3, 2008 8:30 AM:

" Again, Garth.....you do not know the entire story. Do you know whether or not we have ever owned a home? Do you know if maybe our family has suffered another tragic situation that has put us in a situation that was out of our control? We are not asking for a hand out. The point of the story was to inform the public how our government views renters and homeowners. We would like you to think about something....does not owning a home mean you can't afford children, a car, insurance, ect.? The last time we checked renters pay rent (like homeowners pay mortgage) car payment and insurance as well. If a "homeowner" doesn't pay the bills they can lose their home ect.,....just like a renter. Is appears to me renters and homeowners are more alike than maybe you realize. "

garth wrote on Jan 3, 2008 12:55 AM:

" so what if I cannot spell at one in the morning. save your critique? "

garth wrote on Jan 3, 2008 12:54 AM:

" Having more kids than you can provide for is irrisponsible. What more can I say? Coulda, shoulda, woulda, almost hada home .......but did not! Now they expect this sob story to generate feel gooder's to thrown down the hand-outs. A v erbal agreement to purchase the inn sounds yo me like they lacked the funds to properly provide a place for their brood, even before the flood. When I needed a home, I bought it. Then I got insuranced changed from renters policy to a homeowners policy. "

wsutowniealum wrote on Dec 31, 2007 6:20 PM:

" The armchair commentators have come down on this family because they have more than 2.5 kids and do not currently have a mortgage?
From there they argue about which little town got more aid and more publicity for their flooding! The incredibly negative attitude in Winona was one of the reasons I left. I have not encountered such rudeness and general attitude anywhere else. Jane & Eric: you might find a lot less hostility in another community. Winona is a beautiful town visually, but that is where the beauty ends. "

jetpac wrote on Dec 30, 2007 7:39 PM:

" In respnse to "garth"...We are not asking for a hand out. We are not asking for you to pay for anything that we need. That was not the object of the story. The WDN contacted us because of the unique situation and because of comments made by Sharon Ropes. We do not intend to take what is not rightfully offered to us. We take responsiblity for our kids and will continue to do so. I kindly ask you to look past the words in a paper. You do not know our family or even our whole story. Renting does not mean we are poor or cannot afford our children. Again, you do not know our story. Please, don't pass judgement unless you know all the facts. You are entitled to your opinion and I wish you only the best in 2008. "

nikechele wrote on Dec 30, 2007 7:30 PM:

" I will say again as I have posted before. Only 2-4 people in Rushford had flood ins. Do you think a town of 1700 would be so stupid to not ask for flood ins? We did ask and were told no. We live between 2 bodies of water, of course we asked. The people who did get flood ins got paid jack. $5000 does not cut $60000 mortgage. From being on the inside of Rushford's flood, it is hard to comment why there is more attention focused here, besides that there was more damage here than anywhere else. all of it is devastating no matter where and & extent of damage to each home. This flood has uprooted everything we have ever known. do you know how depressing it is to live like this? Depending on others for help? "

old timer wrote on Dec 30, 2007 4:09 PM:

" Take a look in all directions, Stockton is a good place to start if you want to point the finger at "Wanter's-Giveme's-poorme's-benefit'sforme-etc., I drove through Rushfor and I see much progress, take a drive through Stockton & see th difference!!!!! Some are workers & some are do-it-for-me. "

Carissa wrote on Dec 30, 2007 2:33 PM:

" Hey Garth -- Re-read the story... how rude to comment on them not owning a house. If you read the "story" it states very clearly they were in the process of turning the "inn" into their home and business when they lost everything in the flood. Maybe it was temporary that they didn't "own" a home and just because they didn't "own" a home doesn't make them irresponsible. I can name quite a few irresponsible people who do own a home. Open up your mind a little bit and have some compassion. You must be from Winona! "

The Squarehead wrote on Dec 30, 2007 2:20 PM:

" Not replacing the trailer court? Sounds like a good start to me. "

get things right wrote on Dec 30, 2007 12:24 PM:

" I think part of what Garth is saying is that flood insurance is there for even renters. In the trailer court in St. Charles the news crews were there during the flood. And those were the crews from the cities. And the news about the city turning into a "park" that also came from the news from the cities. I have tried to get the WDN to write about St. Charles and get ignored at every turn. Out of the all the trailers in the trailer court, only 3 had flood insurance. The others are left with nothing now. "

nikechele wrote on Dec 30, 2007 11:08 AM:

" There is nothing the Thompsons could have done to prepare for a flood. They are hardworking people doing their best. Not only was Rushford's trailer court destroyed, so were more than 1/2 the main businesses & 100s of homes. If St charles wants recognition for being destroyed, then get out there and tell your stories so we can all hear them. The Thompsons have tried and looked at every possible option, how can they or anyone prepare to be turned down every time? How would you like to be stuck in a maze with no out? "

garth wrote on Dec 30, 2007 10:43 AM:

" I feel for the kids but don't the parents have to be held accountable to plan for the family's well being in all circumstances? What are they doing having 7 kids, if they cannot own their own home to begin with? Why should the governement (me- the taxpayer and provider for my own family) have to fork it out because of someone else not being financially prepared to care for their family? I only have 2 kids for a reason. That's all I can afford to provide for. I did not continue to have more kids and just expect the world to help us if we could not help ourselves. That is the real american "gimme" attitude that has to be stopped!! "

laurie wrote on Dec 30, 2007 9:53 AM:

" Your in our thoughts and prayers. "

get things right wrote on Dec 30, 2007 9:04 AM:

" It upsets me to hear that people are still trying to get help. But I also get upset when everyone ignores St. Charles. Did you know that an entire trailer park was destroyed and that now the city is going to turn it into a "park" and the people that can get help for new trailers have no where to put them. They are out twice. Of course no one knows about this, because the WDN doesn't report on any of the flooding to St. Charles. I feel for this family, trying to explain to little ones and also trying to find a new home. I wish them luck with the new year. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Winona Daily News.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post. Send comments to jerome.christenson@lee.net

We reserve the right not to post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
Log In - If you have already signed up with winonadailynews.com, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, winonadailynews.com requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

WINONA JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises
Minnesota Farm Guide

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The Winona Daily News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.