Click here to view Winona Area Weather
Home > Jerome > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Wednesday, October 03, 2007
POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (32 comment(s))

Not everyone has the same choices in health care

.
They say there are two sides to every story, so here goes. On one side there’s a little girl crying because her ear hurts and a dad and a mom trying to figure out where the money will come from to make it stop. On the other side, there’s a president, born with the proverbial silver spoon in his mouth, whose only concern with money has been whether to spend it, invest it or ask Daddy for more.

Yeah, you see where this is going.
Which makes the likely outcome all the more pitiful.

If you haven’t been following the news, here’s the deal: President Bush is poised to veto (or, by the time you read this has already vetoed) a bill that would help pay the health insurance for that little girl and a lot of kids in her situation. To my knowledge, Mr. Bush’s family has never lacked for health insurance coverage nor for the wherewithal to pay for it.

There are a lot of American families who can’t make that claim.

Let me tell you — and the president — a little about one of them. Mine.

Like most families, there’s not much drama in our story — no massive injury or dread disease. We had three jobs, two kids and plenty of what our Republican friends now call health care choices. Since none of those three jobs came with an insurance plan, we first got to choose between food and rent or a private health insurance policy. While we were certain that winter was coming and we all got hungry on a predicable schedule, we went for what the Bush White House might term the “faith-based option” — we just prayed that nobody would get sick.

Of course, as any good Christian knows, from time to time the Lord is wont to test our faith. In our case with a routine assortment of colds, flu and, especially, earaches. But, as I’m sure Congresswoman Bachmann would be happy to know, under our free-market system we still had plenty of health care choices: we were free to go to the supermarket and choose between Advil, Tylenol, Dimetapp or Robitussin. If we had no choice but to take the kid to the doctor, we got to choose between an overdraft notice or not paying the electric bill.

Let me tell ya, choice in health care isn’t all that the insurance lobby has it cracked up to be. Especially when your kid is crying and there’s nothing you can afford to do to make it better.

We were lucky. There wasn’t much drama in our story and, in time, the right doors opened and, thanks to the magic of a sizable payroll deduction, our family too could have teeth fixed, bones set, drugs prescribed and colons-oscopied — all for the price of a premium, a co-pay and a deductible.

But there are plenty of families who haven’t been so lucky. I hear self-righteous people declare that health care isn’t a right. But in a country that at its founding dared to declare “all men are created equal,” it shouldn’t be an arbitrary privilege either.

And for children, too often that is what it amounts to. Those who are wise in their choice of parents benefit from pre-natal care, well-baby visits, routine immunizations and regular checkups. When an ear hurts, they see a doctor.

Others, whose parents work hard but make too little or whose occupation doesn’t provide access to that all-important “group benefit plan,” get choices. When an ear hurts, they get Tylenol, a heating pad and hopeful thoughts. When, at 2 a.m., it really, really hurts, they get to wait until the walk-in

clinic opens; paying for an emergency room visit is beyond the family means. And when the nurse at the walk-in is confronted with a situation beyond her authority to treat, a referral is arranged and the child will see a doctor, get a prescription and, as soon as the symptoms subside, Mom will cut short the treatment, hoarding the remaining antibiotic for “next time.”

Plenty of choices, but no good ones.

At the risk of being callous, I sure wish Mr. Bush knew that feeling, knew what it’s like to make those choices. Because that’s what it really comes down to, you know: Three people in the dark of the night, and the littlest has an earache.

And a president who just doesn’t care.

Contact Jerome Christenson at (507) 453-3522 or

jchristenson@winona

dailynews.com.
.



Advertisement
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

The business of health care wrote on Oct 7, 2007 10:17 PM:

" Health care equals unfair business practices. What else do consumers purchase and the cost is a surprise in the mail? I heard recently that a hospital in the U.S. has begun to post it prices to the public before service is rendered. GOOD FOR THEM FOR TAKING THE BULL BY THE HORNS AND GOOD FOR US THE CONSUMERS. Let the games begin...free market reign!! "

Been there and I'm still there wrote on Oct 7, 2007 3:48 PM:

" Jerome you know exactly how the system works and the choices are not good. Add on top of that trying to find an M.D. that you like/agree with and that has the time (as allowed by the system) to really listen and think about what the problem is and the treatment needed. It's drive thur M.D. appts., surgery,all care is put on the fast track. People are sent home from the hospital much sicker, weaker and less able to fin for themselves. The system will pay millions to heal something but not a nickel to prevent it. It's all about the buck to be sure.There is no "friend for life" in health care...it's a business plain and simple. "

To J.D. wrote on Oct 7, 2007 7:03 AM:

" You say that you don't have insurance and live on 500.00 a month. What happens when you are hit by a car or when you develop cancer. Who will pay your hospital bill? The state will end up having to!!! I for one don't think that the state should have to pay for you. And don't say - I won't go to the hospital because that's just stupid! We have to figure out a system that works better than just using Medicaid for emergencies.... "

Amen wrote on Oct 7, 2007 5:05 AM:

" Amen Jerome, amen...good job getting the truth about health care choices out and in the light so everyone can see it for what it really is. "

TO Jeez (re: Image Verification) wrote on Oct 6, 2007 1:39 PM:

" Hey "Jeez", the image verification window works best if you pay extra attention to the letters and numbers. Yes, they are hard to read sometimes, but it works about 98% of the time for me. The most frequent mistake I make is between the LETTER l (el) and the NUMERAL 1. They look almost identical - except on the numeral 1, the 'flag' at the top is raked downward, and the flag on top of the letter l is straight. The q and g are also hard to see. I don't think the WDN can fix these. "

Jeez wrote on Oct 6, 2007 1:52 AM:

" wow! way to play the god card dude. seriously though this code at the bottom of the page is getting ridiculous. I works about 8% of the time "

normally a Jerome supporter wrote on Oct 5, 2007 11:52 AM:

" I disagree with Jerome and yet I feel for the young child with the earache. You can empathize with people, but that doesn't mean we should fix all of their problems and give them a free ride. He certainly has the right to express his thoughts on the matter and so do complete conservatives. But somewhere in the middle may eventually be a really great place to end up-----one fine day. "

Nothing is wrong with Jerome's opinion. wrote on Oct 5, 2007 10:36 AM:

" I can't help but laugh at all of the wind and smoke being fired at Jerome because of his posted opinion. There is no "free market" at work in the health care system we have today. Unless you have spoken to someone recently who was able to "shop ahead" before he had a heart attack or was diagnosed with cancer, the idea that people should control the costs associated with catastrophic or long term illness is pure flap-doodle. As for President Bush, the only good thing about his presidency is that it will be over after next year. His veto of SCHIP is just an extension of his personal belief that we should give more to people who already have everything, and continue to ship money by the Billions to Iraq and Afganistan. "

To: You are ignorant or a liar. wrote on Oct 5, 2007 9:25 AM:

" I fear you are misinformed on one point - the program does not extend to all families making $80K "Perhaps the most eye-catching argument from the president is that the vetoed bill would have allowed S-chip to cover children in families earning $83,000 a year. That claim hangs on the extremely flimsy thread that New York � where insurance and living costs are higher than in many other parts of the country � has proposed extending the eligibility level to 400 percent of poverty, or $82,600 for a family of four.(NY Times- 10/5/07)" I'll just have to stand with liberal socialists like Orrin Hatch and Norm Coleman on this one. Jerome Christenson - WDN "

You are ignorant or a liar wrote on Oct 5, 2007 9:01 AM:

" Jerome, I know you are not stupid, but you are ignorant or a liar. The reason this legislation is being vetoed is because it is a bold-faced effort by liberals to socialize a peice of our healthcare. It covers all chidren whose parents make $80,000 or less. 80K is not poor. Heath care is not a right and liberals like yourself calling it a right doesn't make it so. TELL THE TRUTH! Is a sob story designed to manipulate the reader the only thing liberals have to offer? "

Hey Jerome wrote on Oct 5, 2007 8:38 AM:

" I usually like your articles, but you are selling drivel this time! ("all men are created equal") to PURSUE certain...rights, not coerce me to do it for them. Use a narrower brush to paint your sad pictures. "

Insurance (blah) wrote on Oct 5, 2007 8:12 AM:

" Why does everyone need insurance? Has anyone ever done a cost-benefit analysis of the costs of insurance (their premium, employer's premium, co-pay, deductible) and compared that against what their actual costs would be if they were uninsured and obtained the same medical care? I bet more people would start shopping their medical costs if it just came out of pocket and thus, the costs of healthcare would come down because Dr's would have to become more competitive and not just bill the faceless insurance company. I am not saying that for ALL people the true costs of going the insurance route would be more than actual costs, but saying for most people. We take the money I would normally be spending on insurance and put it into a savings account. "

jt wrote on Oct 5, 2007 5:50 AM:

" that po po child can go to any hospital an federal law prohibits the hospital from turning her away. thats our universal health care. and what about medicare that universal health care . ya vote democrat. and we'll all be in the poor house quicker except fed state local gvt workers. and ofcourse the poor poor underpaid teachers "

Mr Balance wrote on Oct 5, 2007 2:36 AM:

" "They say there are two sides to every story......" says JC's column. And you go on to rip the President once again. So does that mean you'll tell the other side of the story in next week's column? I'm talking about the provision in S CHIP that considers anyone under the age of 25 to be a 'child', and therefore eligible to be covered by the taxpayers. Or will you just ignore that part of the story because it doesn't fit with your liberal leanings? I liked your column much more when you stayed away from politics and wrote about other subjects! "

Let's Not Forget ... wrote on Oct 4, 2007 4:28 PM:

" ... that the expansion of SCHIP has the support of a majority of Americans and a majority of our Congressmen. It can withstand the veto in the Senate but is about a dozen votes short in the House. It has wide bipartisan support, and for a good reason: It works. This isn't as simple as a Democrat-Republican division. For example, hear what the "ultra liberal" Orrin Hatch, one of Bush's staunchest allies, had to say: "He has been given advice that this is socialized medicine. Hardly," Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, told reporters Wednesday. "I hope the folks at home raise Cain." "

uninsurable (for under $1700.00 a month anyway) wrote on Oct 4, 2007 12:32 PM:

" the way things work today is, ya go to school, (collage etc) get an o/k to great job, work your fingers to the bone, give half what ya earn to the tax collectors, before ya know what happened your 40-50 years of age, you start to use your company health insurance and whamoo, your company throws ya out with the trash. the next day theres a help wanted ad for your posision, it says "new grad's encouraged to apply". good luck getting another comparable job, not to mention affordable health care, and / or health insurance. stay healthy! "

MN health care wrote on Oct 4, 2007 12:00 PM:

" Yes, it's available to almost everyone. If you have no insurance and you job doesn't offer it; you can apply. But be careful; the co-pay may be hundreds of dollars. Yes, that's hundreds! Mine was going to be almost $400 a month. If I could afford that, I'd get my own private insurance and a state run insurance. And if you are an adult, you can't get it unless you have been without for at least 6 months; so don't get sick or hurt in that time. Health insurance needs to be fixed and fast. My now work insurance, cost me more than I can afford too; but what other choice do I really have? "

We're all "illegal" aliens in one way or another wrote on Oct 4, 2007 7:48 AM:

" El Uno is correct, there isn't much point in taking an "us against them" approach toward today's "illegal" aliens - only the NATIVE American Indians truly deserve to call America home (no, I am not a Native American on a soapbox, I am of European white ancestry). In reality, the European settlers to America were just as "illegal", but the Indians didn't have the "legal" and governmental systems in place that would have given them the platform on which to make that claim. "

playing to his base wrote on Oct 4, 2007 6:02 AM:

" Bush vetoed SCHIP only to placate his conservative base. His public statements as to why he vetoed it are all false. Access to health care should be a right in this country as it is in the rest of the modern world. Education, roads, police and fire protection are. Why not health care? Why is this a moral question in our country? "

to J.D. from a.d. wrote on Oct 3, 2007 9:57 PM:

" Actually, you're wrong and silly. "President" should only be capitalized when it's used as a title or at the beginning of a sentence. So if you are saying "President Bush is an idiot," then it should be capitalized. If, however, you're saying "Our president is an idiot," it's not capitalized. Make sure you don't go into journalism. "

Finally !!!!! wrote on Oct 3, 2007 6:38 PM:

" I can agree with what you have written (finally)!!!Yippeee! Jerome, you got it down and said it better than anybody I've heard before. To the guy who posted first, where is my free health care? Where do I sign up so that I can stop paying $1500 a month for family health care! "

Yep to Yes wrote on Oct 3, 2007 4:51 PM:

" So your saying that people who choose to work at jobs that pay less are not working as hard as those who choose high paying jobs? Do you even have the slightest grip on reality? Plus, some people, unlike yourself, don't have the choice to get into a lucrative career because of UNFAIR conditions in their lives put into place the ruling elite. Come on down off your high horse and take a look around sometime.... "

El Uno wrote on Oct 3, 2007 4:43 PM:

" YES, JEROME!!!!! I was wrong about you, hombre. Keep up the meaningful writing and I will never criticize again. As for J.D., this country is founded on "illegal aliens". "Let's take care of our own" you say???? How bout your president takes that 40 some BILLION DOLLARS he spent on HIS war and starts working on the many problems we have here in the good ol' U.S. of A. "

Yes wrote on Oct 3, 2007 11:06 AM:

" All Americans are created equal. Equal opportunity to chose whatever lifestyle and career they want. If they chose poorly, why then do those who chose wisely have to pick up the bill? According to this article, so those who decided on careers which don't pay so well can be on equal footing with those who work hard for their money I guess. In liberal speak, we are only equal when we are all miserable. "

There is no more discussion, everyone thinks THEY are correct wrote on Oct 3, 2007 9:40 AM:

" What happened to political DEBATE between people of differing thought? All I read and hear now is LIBERAL this and CONSERVATIVE that, and whichever side you are on, the OTHER side is WRONG, PERIOD. Is it no longer possible for two (or more) different 'parties' with different 'ideals' to meet in the middle? What happened to shared compromise? Why have we become a nation where one side is RIGHT and the other side is WRONG? C'mon people, smile on your brother, everybody get together... "

Another Rant wrote on Oct 3, 2007 9:07 AM:

" The WDN editorialists are indeed compassionate. Unfortunately their solutions to social problems always involve more taxpayer dollars. The editorialists are not showing their own charity; only their compassion. They then force the charity onto others. That's being phony to the core. "

Media Matters wrote on Oct 3, 2007 7:39 AM:

" Will we hear about the Liberal pork added to that bill, by democrats, which forces a veto? Probably not. So, if I send you a check for a couple of bucks, will that make you happy? At what point do we as Americans start taking care of ourselves? It really doesn't make much sense to work at anything if I can get food stamps, heating assistance, medical care or housing assistance. Who decided Jerome was going to be a low paid journalist who can't afford to take care of his family? Was that President Bush as well? Of course there's always Socialism. But then Jerome you won't be allowed to express your views anymore unless it conforms to party lines. Kind of like now! "

Kenjo wrote on Oct 3, 2007 7:32 AM:

" Your editorial hit the nail right on the head. When we are too callous to feel compassion and provide care for the kid with an earache--whether an "American" or an illegal alien--we have lost our moral compass as a country. It is not the wealth of the politician that is an issue, it is whether or not that politician--or the citizen--has a heart. Billions and trillions for Bush's war; not a penny for the suffering child.... Where did we go wrong? Your piece was brilliantly written. "

J.D. wrote on Oct 3, 2007 1:40 AM:

" As for your last comment; Jerome, about the President, by the way is a title and should be capitalized, is really irratating. Do you know the President?, have you actually met the man and listen to how he feels. The walk a mile in his shows. "

J.D. wrote on Oct 3, 2007 1:31 AM:

" Who is going to pay for all these illegal aliens kids. The American taxpapers will that's who. Why is it that some feel that we must take care of people who are not American citizen. Let's take care of our own. It use to be that we had the fortitude to solve our problems without the government involvement. "

J.D. wrote on Oct 3, 2007 1:22 AM:

" Sometimes I really feel sorry for you, Jerome. Looking at the world with blinders on just gives you narrow outlook and mind. I for one do not want universal health care, and no I don't have insurance and live on less than $500 a month. This bill with the pork added to it so that illegal alien children can use the insurance. "

Is it Liberal Rant week at the Daily News? wrote on Oct 3, 2007 12:43 AM:

" First, Minnesota offers health insurance to EVERYONE. It's just not free( nor is universal care by ANY stretch of the imagination). Second, if you want to bring up wealthy politicians Jerome, point out one Dem Presidential candidate who isnt a multimillionaire? Do you really have nothing better to do than to take juvenile pot shots at our Presidents? Wow, another fine piece of journalism from the WDN editorial staff... "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Winona Daily News.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post. Send comments to jerome.christenson@lee.net

We reserve the right not to post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
Log In - If you have already signed up with winonadailynews.com, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, winonadailynews.com requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

WINONA JOBS

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises
Minnesota Farm Guide

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The Winona Daily News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.