Click here to view Winona Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Wednesday, August 29, 2007
POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (17 comment(s))

Ship’s overnight cruises could end if fire-safety exemption not renewed

.
WASHINGTON — In a campaign that stretches to the rivers of Europe, steamboat enthusiasts are lobbying to save the famed Delta Queen after Congress refused to renew a fire-safety exemption that has let it operate for nearly four decades.

The elegant, multi-deck paddle wheeler has plied the Mississippi and other rivers for 81 years, recalling a slower-moving era of opulence and romance with rivers. Since 1970, the Delta Queen has toured on overnight trips only through an exemption from Coast Guard regulations for vessels built primarily of wood.
But this summer, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee refused to renew the Delta Queen’s 10-year exemption when it sent a catch-all Coast Guard bill to the floor.

The committee’s chairman, Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., is adamant; he asserts that Congress has given no other ship such an exemption.

“I can’t imagine the number of lives that could be lost if a fire started on the Delta Queen when everyone is asleep,” he said. “Congress would never exempt a particular 747 aircraft from FAA safety standards and we should not exempt a passenger vessel carrying hundreds of sleeping people from Coast Guard safety standards.”

Losing the exemption would prevent the Delta Queen from running overnight cruises after November 2008. The multi-day cruises on a ship rich with mahogany and teak, adorned with stained glass and antiques and featuring fine dining and deluxe linens, are what appeal to well-heeled travelers. Bookings on a seven-night cruise from St. Louis to Nashville next year are advertised at between $2,300 and $3,600 per person for staterooms.

The committee action was an early step in the congressional process. But Seattle-based Majestic America Line, the ship’s owner since last year, surprised Delta Queen fans by seemingly giving up and announcing a farewell celebration for the Delta Queen next year. The boat’s fate has not been spelled out.

The developments have riled Delta Queen devotees as well as fans of steamboats and river culture in general. In an Internet campaign this month, they are attempting to persuade Congress to let the last overnight sternwheel steamboat to continue.

“It’s a relic of American history,” asserted Nori Muster, an Arizona real estate agent whose late father, Bill, led the last such exemption fight 38 years ago.

“People who love the boat must rise up in a movement to save it, or at least pay for its retirement, or it’s going to end up a gambling boat or something that would be sacrilegious.”

Whatever happens, the Delta Queen has survived long enough and with such a storied past that it is recognized as a National Historical Landmark.

The 240-foot long Queen was built in Scotland in 1926 along with its twin, the Delta King, which fell on hard times itself prior to being converted to a hotel and restaurant along the Sacramento River. In their early years in California, the King and Queen were World War II military vessels ferrying naval reservists and wounded soldiers.

After it was bought in 1946, the Queen made a 5,261-mile journey through the Panama Canal to New Orleans, before starting service on midwestern rivers that continues to this day.

In 1963, the Greek ship Lakonia caught fire on a Christmas cruise in the Canary Island, taking 125 lives. Two years later, 90 people perished when the Yarmouth Castle, a multi-wooden deck boat built the same year as Delta Queen, caught fire on a cruise from Miami to Nassau. The tragedies prompted the 1965 Safety of Life at Sea treaty and a new resolve by the Coast Guard to enforce safety rules that required overnight passenger ships to be built with non-flammable materials.

The Delta Queen would have been relegated to day cruises soon after if powerful Rep. Edward Garmatz, D-Md., chairman of the House Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee, had gotten his way.

In a letter to House members in 1970 with his hand-drawn skulls-and-crossbones, Garmatz wrote: “I hope the Delta Queen never burns. But if it does, the blood will be on Congress, not on the expert agencies which told us to stop the operation.”

But a campaign that included Vicki Webster, of St. Louis, who worked in the Richard M. Nixon White House at the time, and included Johnny Cash and other notables, won an exemption from Coast Guard rules. Webster is upset now by what she calls “the stupidity of it all. It’s a typical case of people wanting to be protected from day one from harm. You might have to ride on planes and buses and streetcars from time to time. But nobody has to ride on the Delta Queen.”

The Coast Guard didn’t support the exemption then and doesn’t now, reiterating in a statement earlier this month that the exemption would pose “an unacceptable risk.” The statement added that the Delta Queen still could make sightseeing runs and voyages without overnight guests.

The vessel is subject to frequent inspections. For instance, records show the Coast Guard found improper wiring “creating a possible fire hazard” during an inspection in February in New Orleans. It was later fixed.

Majestic America Line, argues that training, sprinklers and various fire and smoke detection devices provide ample protection for passengers. The company insists that it lobbied vigorously to retain the exemption and didn’t declare the cause lost until Oberstar and his Senate counterpart, Daniel Inouye, chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation, each said no.

“We’d be ecstatic if someone were to carry the torch at this point,” said Joseph McCarthy, chief counsel for Ambassadors International, Majestic’s parent company.

Thus far, efforts by Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., and others who have backed the exemption have fallen short.

Meanwhile, a Save the Delta Queen Internet campaign organized from Germany is picking up steam.

Franz Neumeier, who started the campaign, isn’t optimistic. “It doesn’t look good at the moment,” said Neumeier, 38, who edits two computer magazines in Munich. He spoke while cruising the Ohio River on another steamboat, the American Queen.

Long-time Delta Queen fans like Beau Hampton, who has played Dixieland drums on many cruises, says he sees no valid issue based on his work on 50 vessels.

“It’s a joke. If a fire breaks out, you just pull over to the side of the river. It’s not like we’re gonna sink or anything,” he said.

Others, like Arizona’s Nori Muster, see more at stake than cruising in their lifelong attachment to the Delta Queen.

“Boats are my deities,” said Muster. “They are symbols of something good about America. They represent innocence and progress, and they tell us a lot about human folly.

DELTA QUEEN’S STORIED PAST

— Built in 1926 from parts made in Scotland and shipped to California.

— Began service in 1927.

— Ferried naval reservists and wounded soldiers during WWII.

— Sold in 1946 and traveled through the Panama Canal to New Orleans, where it began cruising Midwestern rivers.

— Began landing in St. Louis in 1954.

— Has been designated a National Historic Landmark.
.



Advertisement
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

deltaqueensmile wrote on Sep 4, 2007 8:02 AM:

" SAVE THE DELTA QUEEN! Call or write your Congressman today! I have taken 13 trips on the DELTA QUEEN and feel much safer on her than anywhere, including driving back and forth to work. The problem really begins with the Seafarer International Union. Their members were not hired to crew the boat this year and they have done about face after supporting the exemtption for 40 years. See who really runs this country? Representative Oberstar and Senator Inouye are only pawns! "

Here's your new Wilkie wrote on Aug 30, 2007 10:46 AM:

" Once the DQ, or any of the other wooden paddlewheelers, are officially obsolete, why not park one on the levee and paint a Wilkie sign on it? At least it would be a real boat and probably wouldn't have to be condemned for a couple of years anyway. You could probably get the Marine Art Museum to buy it and add it to its fleet. Just a thought. "

Frank Schnurstein wrote on Aug 29, 2007 11:28 PM:

" I am a retired professional firefighter. Alarms, automatic and manual fire suppression systems do not always function. Lives, buildings and vessels are lost. Ever see a church burn? Fire and smoke spread quickly in wooden structures, not just because it's wood but also because of the products used to preserve and seal the wood. Was the fire caused by a collision? An electrical problem? Will the crew extinguish the fire? Will they loose steerage because of electrical or hydraulic failure? If fire was licking at their butts, you would have people in the water with or without PFDs. Even if they have enough water depth to beach the boat, can people get off quickly enough? There's no lifeboats that I am aware on those vessels either. Ask yourself why have the owners given up so easily? "

Kevin H wrote on Aug 29, 2007 4:52 PM:

" If the Delta Queen is so dangerous, why is it allowed to be on the water at all? Is it REALLY anymore dangerous at night? "

To 12:49pm (personal grudge) wrote on Aug 29, 2007 3:16 PM:

" I never suggested that I would deny Kevin H is right to write. I would never suggest that any other reader should specifically read - or not read - any person's comment. You, however, have instructed me to lay down my personal grudge. I have not instructed you to do anything. What gives you the right to do so, while subtly 'correcting' me at the same time? Let me read what I want, think what I want, and write what I want. I'll decide if your "say" is worth anything. "

FWB wrote on Aug 29, 2007 2:51 PM:

" I didn't say beach her -- only pointed out the serious safety risks of a wooden steamer. Kevin is pretty arrogant in claiming that a catastrophe could never happen - even with modern safety systems. Take a look at the I35W Bridge and the "unsinkable" Titanic, etc. A boat load of senior citizens (typically the only ones who can afford DQ cruises) would have a tough time abandoning ship and making it to shore! What insurance company will continue to underwrite a wooden steamer? At what cost? If she burns to the waterline you'll all be whining because she is no more...There are better, safer materials than wood to minimize the risk to passengers. Why do you think wooden steamers were replaced by iron and steel ships anyway? It's a safety issue! "

Kevin H wrote on Aug 29, 2007 1:28 PM:

" How would the pilot house or engine room become "engulfed with flames"? Those are two places where there are going to be people on duty at ALL times. Any fire would be quickly seen and extinguished LONG before any serious damage was caused. btw, how many of those steamboats that burned throughout history had modern smoke detectors and sprinkler systems? "

To Hypothetical wrote on Aug 29, 2007 12:58 PM:

" I agree with your entire premise, however, take the partisan politics out of the mix. It doesn't matter which group has the Office, and as for "fear", liberal Dems use it just as effectively. I believe there is hope, but as long as we continue to believe that politicians will make life better for all of us, the dimmer the hope becomes. Time for a new pioneer spirit of individualism (which, by the way, politicians must kill to succeed) "

To 10:15 wrote on Aug 29, 2007 12:49 PM:

" Lay down your personal grudge, and let Kevin H have his say. The rest of us can, and will decide whether his "say" is worth anything. "

Save The Queen wrote on Aug 29, 2007 12:46 PM:

" Oberstar is an idiot. As for FWB, (you) may be right, but what would this country be if the government had been regulating all the risky activities which allowed this country to stretch and grow? Authorities continue to push for the power to save us from ourselves, based on their idea of "how it should be", and your kind continue to encourage them. Now some local governments are banning baggy pants. How utterly arrogant (and stupid) have we become? "

Beth wrote on Aug 29, 2007 11:30 AM:

" Obviously the chances of a fire killing everyone on board aren't that high. This thing has operated since 1927 and fire precautions and standards have certainly increased since then. As long as people are informed of the risk and are freely choose to take it, the government shouldn't prevent them from riding. That doesn't mean, however, that the Coast Guard should be obligated to respond if a disaster were to occur. Perhaps a waiver could be developed from the ship to the guard and from riders to the ship. And as long as people are keeping watch at night and there's an alarm system, couldn't people die in a fire in the day as well? "

Oberstar's web site only accepts email from the 8th District wrote on Aug 29, 2007 10:32 AM:

" I went to Mr. Oberstar's web site to contact his office by email, but it states that he is only allowed to accept email from his own 8th District. If his politics affect my life, I should be able to send his office a message. What's wrong with this picture? "

Kevin H is a legend in his own mind wrote on Aug 29, 2007 10:15 AM:

" Just ask Kevin H anything. He'll have the assump - I mean, the answer - for everything. "

Life is dangerous wrote on Aug 29, 2007 9:58 AM:

" I agree with the 8:38 poster. I am sick and tired of the government (and lawyers by default) telling us how to live our lives. They tell us its for our own safety, but I think my safety is my own responsibility. Every time I fly or drive I know there is some chance of dieing, but that is my choice. The delta queen is a national treasure that we should make accomodations for. We are killing what little culture we have left due to some busy body with an issue. "

FWB wrote on Aug 29, 2007 8:50 AM:

" Anyone who thinks a catastrophic fire aboard a wooden steamboat isn't possible, that lives wouldn't be lost, and that "shore is, at most, five minutes away" is truly, spectacularly ignorant of river history. Our river history includes hundreds of wooden steamers lost on the river (even dockside, e.g. the War Eagle) due to fire, often with great loss of life. But then Americans don't study history any more. A fire on that wooden steamer, fanned by the wind, would spread so quickly it would make your head spin. And what if the pilot house or engines are engulfed in flames? Good luck getting to shore! You better be a darn strong swimmer! The next day everyone would be wailing and wringing their hands as rescue crews dragged for bodies, just like years ago. The Coast Guard is correct! Ask the old-timers about steamboat fires! "

It's all hypothetical wrote on Aug 29, 2007 8:38 AM:

" We are becoming a nation of cowering, fearing people, afraid of our own shadows and of even the slightest possibility of disaster. We are told we are "freedom loving" people who in fact are losing more of our freedoms every day under the current presidential administration. The fear bleeds into every single aspect of our lives, such as river cruising on a vessel that - ironically - evokes a simpler time. America as it was originally designed is failing, falling, dying. "

Kevin H wrote on Aug 29, 2007 12:30 AM:

" Oberstar Quote: “I can’t imagine the number of lives that could be lost if a fire started on the Delta Queen when everyone is asleep.” I can. Most likely none. First of all, there's going to be crew on duty. It won't take them long to detect, isolate and extinguish any fire large enough to do serious damage. It may take longer to detect a small fire, but that would also do less damage. Second, as was mentioned, safety of shore is, at most, 5 minutes away. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Winona Daily News.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post. Send comments to jerome.christenson@lee.net

We reserve the right not to post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
Log In - If you have already signed up with winonadailynews.com, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, winonadailynews.com requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

WINONA JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises
Minnesota Farm Guide

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The Winona Daily News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.