Click here to view Winona Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Monday, January 22, 2007
POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (106 comment(s))

Lewiston again without city administrator

.
Lewiston’s city administrator resigned Tuesday, leaving the city’s top position vacant for the second time within a year.

Deb Spitzer’s resignation will be effective Jan. 30, about seven months after she started the job. Spitzer said she stepped down after the city council extended her six-month probationary employment period.
“It was made very obvious to me during the city council meeting that you have other intentions for my position,” Spitzer wrote to the city in her resignation letter.

In a telephone interview from her city office Thursday, Spitzer said, “I just felt like I was not going to be in this capacity for another three months. The city council pushed my probation back another three months, and this was the third time it had been on the council agenda. I can understand if I was just appointed in December.”

Spitzer said she has taken an accounting job in the private sector.

The city of Lewiston hired Spitzer as the billing clerk on May 17. A week later, the city council offered her the city administrator job after a search committee found her to be more qualified than the candidates it reviewed.

Lewiston’s former city administrator, Barry Kramer, and former deputy clerk, Mary Jane Vogel, resigned within two weeks of each other in early 2006 after an ongoing dispute with council members Bruce Boynton and Richard Ahrens, who said the two staffers did not provide monthly city budgets.

Vogel and Kramer had said the city hired them knowing they did not know how to use the software.

Spitzer accepted the promotion and started her new post June 28 — and became the city’s first employee who knew how to use the accounting software.

Spitzer, who has an accounting degree from Winona State University, had worked government positions for the past 15 years and had prior experience with similar software at her former job as accountant for the city of St. Charles, but resigned when her husband, Winona County Sheriff’s Deputy Bill Spitzer was elected mayor.

As city administrator, Spitzer took care of Lewiston’s finances, building permits and state reports. Like all new city employees, she was placed on a six-month probationary period.

The council planned to discuss her review at its Dec. 13 meeting, but postponed it until Dec. 28 and again on Jan. 10 because of the election of a new mayor, Lee Rain, and two new council members, Jack Kanz and Garry Sauers.

Council member Richard Ahrens said he was surprised when he found out Spitzer had resigned.

“We had our last meeting and I thought we were working together, and all of a sudden she gave her resignation,” he said. “Our (former) mayor gets a little obstinate and threatening, and that’s why we didn’t have her evaluation before.”

The meeting he referred to was a closed-door meeting Dec. 28 with the former council and mayor, which ended with council member Boynton walking out, according to Ahrens and Spitzer.

In a telephone interview on Sunday, Mayor Rain expressed frustration about discussing Spitzer’s resignation

“It kind of perturbs me,” he said. “What’s the big deal about Lewiston? People are getting hired and fired all the time.”

Rain said it was up to the city council to decide what to do next and was unsure of the direction the city would take.

He refused to comment further.

Steve Kanz, a member of the city council’s comprehensive planning committee, said Lewiston’s finances have always been an issue in the town of 1,500.

“Everybody in town wants to know where we’re at,” Kanz said. “We need to build new streets, a pool, parks and a library.”

Kanz said he thought Spitzer was qualified and didn’t believe her job performance was the reason for the council postponing her evaluations.

“I don’t think (her resignation) puts us in a bad spot,” he said. “I think this town is going to move forward.”

Amber Dulek can be reached at (507) 453-3513 or at amber.dulek@lee.net.
.




Advertisement
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

RIDICULOUS wrote on Feb 5, 2007 10:19 PM:

" Ridiculous is to not learn from past mistakes and continue to make the same ones over and over again. The city attorney is going to be mailed the aplications, so yes he should be involved in the writing of the ad. Obviously you don't care what the old council did, but lets be greatful that our new council does. This way the same mistakes won't be repeated. "

SAVING MONEY wrote on Feb 5, 2007 6:54 PM:

" TO WRITE AN AD? RIDICULOUS..... WHO CARES WHAT THE OLD COUNCIL DID OR DIDN'T DO. THE NEW TEMP SURELY KNOWS HOW TO PUT TOGETHER AN AD, OR AT LEAST HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE TO KNOW WHERE TO GO TO SEE SIMILAR ADS. lIKE I SAID, JUST RIDICULOUS TO PAY THAT KIND OF MONEY OUT FOR THE ATTORNEY TO WRITE AN AD. "

To Saving Money: wrote on Feb 5, 2007 1:40 PM:

" 150.00 an hour would be very minimal if things aren't done properly and the city ends up in court. OLD council didn't like using the city attorney and they got burned a few times. Much smarter to have the attorney involved BEFORE there is trouble. "

To Guardian wrote on Feb 4, 2007 9:34 AM:

" Thanks for clarifying the spelling bee issue. Your very correct on another issue, Public Service is THANKLESS and thats why MOST people stay out of it. But the people that do enter into it know fully well what they are in for, and if they don't HELLO! I work for a company that has well over 500 employees and there is many department heads, they all need purchase and payment approval. There is checks and balances in all "quality" companies this is whether you have "quality" employees or not. If you don't have these checks and balances your company won't be around very long. You say let the department heads do their jobs, I say let the city council do their ELECTED JOBS! "

Department Heads wrote on Feb 2, 2007 11:07 AM:

" What department heads? I only now of two department heads in the city, police and ambulance. If there was a department head in the city public works, surely he/she would know how to make an educated decision to ask for big dollar items. At least the council had some common sense to get a decent interim in the office, hopefully things look up from here. "

saving money? wrote on Feb 2, 2007 8:32 AM:

" all I hear is the new council is going to save the city money...sure looks like it, paying the city attorney to write an ad for an administrator at probably 150.00 an hour, when they could have easily looked on the Leagues website and found out what to put in an ad, he is smiling all the way to the bank as much as this council is using him, all that shuffling of paper at his wages, he loves it. "

The Guardian wrote on Feb 1, 2007 11:42 PM:

" Old Apple. I wasn't knocking your spelling just wanted to clarify if you were talking about cattle or hearing something..... I assumed hearing something. What are department heads suppose to do? Collect a pay check and get criticized for not earning their pay? Public service has and will always be a thankless job. Like I said let the department heads do their job. Not many good companies would run without quality employees. "

The Guardian wrote on Feb 1, 2007 11:39 PM:

" Old Apple. I wasn't knocking your spelling just wanted to clarify if you were talking about cattle or hearing something..... I assumed hearing something. What are department heads suppose to do? Collect a pay check and get criticized for not earning their pay? Public service has and will always be a thankless job. Like I said let the department heads do their job. Not many good companies would run without quality employees. "

OLD APPLE wrote on Feb 1, 2007 8:51 AM:

" Guardian since your spelling is so GREAT, please explain what a COUTESY is? Budget approval is NOT purchase or payment approval. Since when did department heads run the city? You stated that your work is done here, THANK GOD! "

The Guardian wrote on Jan 31, 2007 9:42 PM:

" OOOPs sorry. Thought you would have went to the council meeting before calling me a liar. Lets go to the video tape. I heard (not herd...thats cattle) about the visit to Tim's...that was a coutesy. You want a dollar amount....$1000.00 unbudgeted items....$5000.00 budgeted. Let the department heads do their job or why did you hire them? Does the Lewiston Budget even have line items.....not the one I have seen. BTW its all better now that the current council "now knows how much the repaired sander" will cost. Ever heard of asking the question first? The big production is over, on to the cost of the next "apple". It should be an exciting year of TV this year. Stay tuned! My work is done here. "

Corporate World wrote on Jan 31, 2007 5:27 PM:

" Guardian if you have worked in the corporate world you would know that a budget, that is not line itemed, is for planning purposes only. A budget is not a guaranteed expense or a means of authorization for expenses. This is called managing not micromanaging. "

Answer Please wrote on Jan 31, 2007 1:54 PM:

" guardian you finally say that "major" purchases should be authorized by the council. But you haven't answered the question, in your opinion how many $ does an item need to cost to constitute authorization? Wouldn't our NEW administrator be able to do said job easier if the code book stated a $ amount in it for this authorization? Its obvious to me that many in this community differ from what this $ amount should be. But PLEASE share your opinion of what you feel is a MAJOR expenditure, in a $ form PLEASE. "

Facts? wrote on Jan 31, 2007 9:37 AM:

" Guardian you say you attended the council meeting and know that the old spreader would cost 3,500 to repair correct? Who said this? The city workers who purchased it without authorization to do so correct? You must have also herd that a city councilmen called Tim's and was told that the old spreader was not junk and could be repaired with minimal parts and $ Yes guardian PLEASE JUST THE FACTS! "

The Guardian wrote on Jan 30, 2007 10:23 PM:

" Remember hurt people hurt people. Just the facts...please "

The Guardian wrote on Jan 30, 2007 10:21 PM:

" I didn't watch the council meeting. I attended it. I get my information from the source not the blogs or the coffee house. To repair the spreader according to an estimate was in excess of $3500.00 and a new one was more cost effective. You are right that the council should approve major expenditures but you have to trust the employees to handle the budgeted items. Unfortunately lewiston doesn't list item by item budgeted items...they are discussed and budgeted. Not sure were the authorized amount you are talking about but the code book says Adm will take care of carring out budget...No $$ amount. Maybe after tonight the light will be at the end of the tunnel? "

Hahaha. wrote on Jan 30, 2007 12:12 PM:

" I watched the last council meeting on TV... it seemed to me all they were doing was shuffling papers and wasting time. "

Question to the Guardian wrote on Jan 29, 2007 10:55 PM:

" Maybe when you were on the council you should of voted in a said $ amount so that the administrator wouldn't have needed to get authorization for $2,800 purchases. Currently authorization for such purchases is required. What is the amount you feel this position should be able to approve without getting authrization from the mayor or councilmen? I am expecting your answer to be very educational after reading about your apples! "

To the Guardian wrote on Jan 29, 2007 9:58 PM:

" There you go again comparing a $2,800 spreader to an apple like $2,800 is nothing, or petty cash. When did the coucil approve a $2,800 spreader? What budget report had that listed in it? Did you listen to the meeting on the 24th? The old spreader wasn't in bad shape and can be repaired for minimal parts and cost! Isn't making the necessary repairs to the OLD spreader also preparing for bad weather? At first I thought you had a very distorted version of micromanaging, but now I think you just have tunnel vision. "

Clean up comments wrote on Jan 29, 2007 6:13 PM:

" Money in the bank for present or future????? Didn't you mean money in the bank for paying Lewiston's bills coming due? Most of those cd's are already spoken for. Build a new pool, start the big street project and Lewiston will be in the "RED". Lewiston still needs to repair the wells that our old council new about, and how about the upgrades at our sewage plant? Does Lewiston have cd's for all of this too? "

Regarding Monday comments: wrote on Jan 29, 2007 6:04 PM:

" Who is the "behind the scenes mayor?" A name would be nice? Where do you think our last mayor spent almost every morning? So meeting at the local coffee shop isn't anything new for the Lewiston council now is it? I know our past Mayor couldn't wait to put his house up forsale and purchase property OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS AND TAXES, this shows Lewiston how much he cares. "

Reply to clean up. wrote on Jan 29, 2007 5:58 PM:

" I just reviewed all the comments again, who keeps harping on the city being broke? Why is pointing out that A LOT of money has been spent in areas that are VERY questionable harping? There is no question Lewiston has some very well off residents that wouldn't mind seeing the council do the BIG DIG again, or build a new pool. Most residents can not afford these tax increases. CD's in the bank? Yes and as the last council meeting showed these cd's have already been spoken for by paying off our outstanding loans, NOT NEW LOANS! "

Thomas R (Bob) Hennessy wrote on Jan 29, 2007 2:43 PM:

" I have been away from any local news for the past week. Wow! What great reading this has been. Quite a story in our little town of Lewiston. I was surprised to read so many comments from local folks who fail to identify themselves. Have a great day! Bob "

Clean up? wrote on Jan 29, 2007 11:25 AM:

" Clean up what mess, there wasn't a mess until the last two councilmen got in, everything was going fine, things were getting done and everyone was getting along. It has gone downhill since, even the committee that hired Deb must be embarrassed. Also, Lewiston is not broke, you constantly harp on that, trying to make people believe it if you say it long enough. There is money in the bank, cd's to use etc,. Broke to me means in the red and nothing for the present. "

monday wrote on Jan 29, 2007 11:16 AM:

" Monday morning in Lewiston, Councilmen at the downtown meeting place, getting all their ducks in a row for Tuesday nights meeting, making sure they have all the answers from the behind the scenes Mayor. "

The Guardian wrote on Jan 28, 2007 9:32 PM:

" I didn’t have enough room to define micromanaging…example = Lets budget for 1000 apples this year. Lets approve the purchase of each apple. No wait, Lets tell them what kind of apple they can buy. And one last thing, Lets approve the color of each apple. Lets hope that Councilman A and Councilman B and Councilman (you get the picture) doesn’t get to that point or driving around town following staff members! You hire a staff to do a job. Let them do it. Constantly badgering them will get poor results. Council sets the guidelines they don’t need their fingers in everything! "

The Guardian wrote on Jan 28, 2007 9:26 PM:

" T&A....interesting name! It seems that you know alot about what is going on? You must know the city council approves a budget and capital expenditures. Those expenditures are discussed and approved with the budget. Question? Why would you need something reapproved if it had already been approved in a budget? Can you define micromanaging? As far as authorization, I believe the purchase was made to prepare for a weather emergency....you would probably be on the other side of the fence if we had an ice storm and the roads were not sanded because of a sander that needed to be replaced. Council sets the budget, administration carries out the necessary purchases which were decided upon in the budget process. Next the council will want preapproval on Toilet paper & Ant trap purchases. That's why you have an administrator! "

good luck but good bye! wrote on Jan 28, 2007 3:45 PM:

" After watching the 24th meeting it became crystal clear why the council had issue with our administrator. "

Get off the past? wrote on Jan 28, 2007 3:43 PM:

" Please explain how the residents are to GET OFF THE PAST AND JUST MOVE ON? when the past put us in the financial position that we are in now? If you watch and continue to watch even the current meetings we will be dealing with the PAST for many YEARS to come! Maybe you don't care about your money (tax dollars) being wasted, but some of us do! "

Open eyes wrote on Jan 26, 2007 3:12 PM:

" I encourage all concerned residents to attend the next city counsil mtg. If this first month is any indication of how the new mayor and his council plan to conduct business then we all need to wake up and attend mtgs and start holding them responsible for the downward slide in morale and negative face they are giving Lewiston. We need a mayor and council that will work hard for us to turn this all around... Is that possible? I think not unless we all take the time to show up and demand better than what we are getting. "

Eric wrote on Jan 26, 2007 11:34 AM:

" I just received the council meeting minutes from mid November......In my water bill last week. Why does it take two months to get the minutes put together and sent out? I encourage everyone in Lewiston to start attending the council meetings. I will be there on Feb 14. "

325 wrote on Jan 26, 2007 9:05 AM:

" Unfortunately over time there has been established a culture in the city that enjoys criticizing the city operations. The current group that fosters this culture is now the group that is able to influence the direction of the community. Now is the time for the residents to see how they are able to perform in those same chairs where others have tried to solve years of city issues within a short council term. Best of luck to them. "

to Guardian from T&A wrote on Jan 26, 2007 8:30 AM:

" Granted Ms. Spitzer did a valid job on certain aspects of her position, but she was overly eager to overstep said position. I am glad that she offered a memo as to explain what she had done; however, that is not prior authorization. (As required) It is nice to know that you are satisfied with Ms. Spitzer's job performance--clearly everyone does not share that opinion. "

To Accountability wrote on Jan 26, 2007 8:28 AM:

" There is nothing wrong with accountability in your employees, but not to the point of harrassment, we have very honest and hardworking city employees, yes mistakes are made, but the councilmen do not have to make them sound worthless, there are ways to handle employees, and not one of them know how. It is made to sound like they are trying to steal from the city. What a shame. "

to 62 wrote on Jan 26, 2007 8:22 AM:

" get off the past, move on, no one wants the thankless job, because people like you criticize all the time, even when a person is honestly trying to do their job, it is never good enough...you step up and run. "

The Guardian wrote on Jan 25, 2007 11:20 PM:

" Dear Truth & Action and resident, I'm very close to this issue. Enlighten me, the readers and apparently the city council members of these "necessary facts" on the probationary period! Worthless? I guess that is why she balanced the books, provided financial reports to council members, straighened out financial errors, saved the city thousands of dollars in fines and organized the front office. A major accomplishment with no administrator experience, in only 6 months and at only 30 hours a week according to some knowledgable writer! You missed some hours, trust me I was counting! Why did the hiring committee pass over "resident"? As for the new council trying to keep her....their response when she handed in her notice...ok thanks! She attempted to provide a memo explaining the purchase of a sander....they refused to take it! Good Luck Deb... "

Accountability wrote on Jan 25, 2007 10:24 PM:

" Starts with city employees, not the city residents! "

what next? wrote on Jan 25, 2007 6:09 PM:

" Lewiston has lost two city administrators and a clerk in about 1 year. It took a long time to get Mrs. Spitzer in after Mr. Kramer left, now how long will it take? Is it the city council's strategy to pick apart every department until they have who they want in place? Why not leave the qualified employees alone to do their jobs. Instead of wasting time micro managing responsible employees, why doesn't the council focus on the growth of Lewiston? What about the library, a new pool, fixing up the downtown buildings or making room for more homes in the area? Without this what does Lewiston actually offer? "

62 wrote on Jan 25, 2007 5:57 PM:

" After reading all 62 responses to this article I did not read once where anyone said they were perfect! Why is the council wanting to know what they have for a balance of funds before spending more money wrong? and maybe the current mayor ran because NO one else wanted the thankless job! Think about who would be mayor if he hadn't run? I'm sure someone would of recommended asking our old mayor to take it again.......... YUK! "

extended probation for what? wrote on Jan 25, 2007 5:57 PM:

" If you watched or attended the council mtg regarding Deb's probation, did anyone notice nothing was discussed about her job performance? Yet, council members had several requests for Deb to find financial information. The ONLY reason her probation was extended was because she did not work with all the council members. What does that have to do with her actually doing her job? Now that she is leaving how will the council get all the financial info they requested? Will it take another 6+ months to find someone--what happens in the meantime? We hate to see you go-Best of luck to Deb!!! "

Concerned Ambulance Member wrote on Jan 25, 2007 5:27 PM:

" Maybe you should ask Holly to her face - she will be the first to tell you, she will do anything she can to help the City during the vacancy and while Rebecca is on vacation, in areas she can help with - however she is not qualified and doesn't care to be qualified as an account or administrator, I have asked her, because I heard the same rumor. "

Alan Mote wrote on Jan 25, 2007 5:24 PM:

" November 2005 - Ambulance Director Hired, March 2006 - Ambulance Director was a City Position, September 2006 - Ambulance Director Probationary period evaluated and presented to council with no extension. October 2006 - Mr. Sommers forgot what happened at the September meeting and requested a new probationary period. "

To the city council: wrote on Jan 25, 2007 5:23 PM:

" could you PLEASE stop trying to manage the city of Lewiston, the city employees are becoming stressed over feeling like they are at their jobs and they don't like having to answer questions about what they do and why they did things. After all you guys, its not like they are spending the taxpayers money! "

Holly wrote on Jan 25, 2007 5:22 PM:

" Accountability - maybe everyone here should post their real name and take accountability for their comment, and slander of all city employees and council members. "

Car wrote on Jan 25, 2007 5:11 PM:

" I could use a good used car, maybe if I walk into the city hall they will cut me a check to buy one? "

To All: wrote on Jan 25, 2007 12:19 PM:

" I breifly sat in on the council meeting last night and caught the part regarding hollys probation and if i recall correctly she was put on probation last October. I still have the article from the lewiston journal. Our now administraor soon to be former adminisrator needs to be left alone and just let her finish off her remaining two weeks in peace. "

... wrote on Jan 25, 2007 8:42 AM:

" I swear, if they put Holly in the administrator position, I'll flip a lid. "

Confused again wrote on Jan 25, 2007 8:22 AM:

" Well, let me see if I got this right! #1.The council didn't think Barry was qualified and he had a degree in accounting.#2.The coucil didn't think Mary Jane was qualified and she had bookkeeping experience.#3.The council doesn't think Deb is qualified and she has the education, experience and the knowledge to run the "needed city software"#4Now there is rumors that the council is in favor of putting the ambulance director in her place which has no and I say no education or experience in accounting. Hmmmmmm, what is going on? I think it is time for all Lewiston residents to stand up and face this council and start micromangaging them for awhile and make them accountable for their actions.None of this makes any sense and they seem to get away with it all. Good luck Deb in your new venture. You will definitely be better off....... "

Lewistonian wrote on Jan 24, 2007 9:19 PM:

" To be honest, I have never lived in a small town with so many "issues". Bedsides the fact that our city ends up in the Winona newspaper on a quarterly basis, the spokesperson for our city - the Mayor - can't think of anything intelligent to say to the reporters. I mean come on - "What's the big deal - people resign all of the time" and "no further comment". I guess they should have called me. I could have found a few things to say! REALLYYYYYYY!!!!! P.S. I'm sad to see Mrs. Spitzer go. She 's the only person in city government who had an accounting degree and, oh yes, could actually use the accounting software purchased by the city? Who's going to balance the checkbook now? "

to the old council wrote on Jan 24, 2007 8:46 PM:

" If you want people to read your posting and find it intelligent, you should really check your spelling, it tells a story. "

to very concerned citizen wrote on Jan 24, 2007 8:42 PM:

" Talk about throwing stones, once again, look in the mirror. If the new mayor can't handle the heat why did he run? No sense in blaming, there is no one that is perfect, not even you. "

Lewistonian wrote on Jan 24, 2007 7:56 PM:

" To be honest, I have never lived in a small town with so many "issues". Bedsides the fact that our city ends up in the Winona newspaper on a quarterly basis, the spokesperson for our city - Lee Rain - can't think of anything intelligent to say to the reporters. I mean come on - "What's the big deal - people resign all of the time" and "no further comment". I guess they should have called me. I could have found a few things to say! REALLYYYYYYY!!!!! P.S. I'm sad to see Mrs. Spitzer go. She 's the only person in city government who had an accounting degree and, oh yes, could actually use the accounting software purchased by the city? Who's going to balance the checkbook now? "

Re: where do you all work [Dagwood] wrote on Jan 24, 2007 5:35 PM:

" It sounds like you work at McDonalds. Maybe the city council can give you an interview. I'm sure there will be some vacancies. "

Dagwood wrote on Jan 24, 2007 5:27 PM:

" Again we have people that still like to bicker,do you want your streets sanded or would you like to bicker about that too. It cost money to maintain. The way things are run at city hall the sander issue would have been tabled or maybe council members would've walked out of the meeting just so they could put the blame on some one else. It's just easier that way! You can see how this uneducated council is going to work because of there first diappointing action with Ms.Spitzer. How embarrasing "

Question? wrote on Jan 24, 2007 5:02 PM:

" Why is it that if your a councilmen in Lewiston and you feel that the money to fund projects should be in the bank account before you go forward with street projects, a new pool, buying equipment, funding a library, upgrading parks, etc. etc. you are called a STALLER, or SHOWSTOPPER? I call this being FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE to the voters and taxpayers of Lewiston! "

Reply to "Lewiston" wrote on Jan 24, 2007 4:49 PM:

" I believe Mr Mayor told the paper he didn't and wouldn't comment on the administrator position being open again. Why did you instantly jump to the conclusion that he needs to wake up, like he isn't doing anything to keep her? Do you know that he isn't doing anything? Maybe you should wake up and realize that it was a VERY smart move not commenting to the paper and having his comments printed in the daily paper so even more sleepy heads can jump down his throat! "

Very Concerned Citizen wrote on Jan 24, 2007 3:05 PM:

" I challenge all residents to give the new mayor a chance with the current council. If you want to throw stones before they even get their feet wet why didn't you run against the current mayor? The new mayor didn't walk into this job with a clean plate and fresh start, the old mayor and council made sure he would have lots of dirt to clean up! "

concerned citizen wrote on Jan 24, 2007 1:44 PM:

" I CHALLENGE ALL RESIDENTS TO COME TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON THE 2ND AND 4TH WED OF THE MONTH GET INVOLVED!!!! "

The old council wrote on Jan 24, 2007 8:25 AM:

" the old council wanted to spend your money? Yes they did, money they had NO idea we did or didn't have. Lewiston has the money to do the HJ project? What have you been watching? Not the same meetings I have been. You act just like my kids, money grows on trees with some of you! How can a council spend money that may or may NOT be there sometime this coming year? that would be real responsible spending on their part yes? I think not and so did the so called "2" that blocked Mr Engrave and Mr Sommers! thank GOD we had two responsible city council men. "

To Blonde: wrote on Jan 23, 2007 8:26 PM:

" I think more good will be done by comprehensive planning than was done in all of Mr Engraves terms! Why does the "Main street discussions" concern so many people in such a negative way? Aren't we all tax payers in the community? Don't we have the RIGHT to talk about how are tax dollars are being spent? or is there some agenda that past councilmen and mayors would like to keep covered up so the community doesn't find out about? makes me wonder!!! "

Reply to Dagwood wrote on Jan 23, 2007 8:18 PM:

" Not sure if many would agree that a $2,500 sander/spreader is in the same catigory as a nut, bolt, screw, oil, or lawn mower blade? Hello! "

lewiston wrote on Jan 23, 2007 6:53 PM:

" Wake up Mayor and city council! We are losing a qualified and trustworthy city administrator. Why isn't anyone trying to get Spitzer to reconsider? What non qualified person is the city going to hire in attempt to run the city? I think they should bring Spitzer back to the table, pass her probation immeadiately, and let her do what she was hired to do. Her Job!! "

No new houses? wrote on Jan 23, 2007 6:17 PM:

" No new houses could be hooked up to the old ponds? Not totally true. No new houses hooked up to the degraded ponds. But could they have been upgraded? Lined and repaired? Now there is the question? But that wasn't looked into, until after the millions had been spent already! No new houses in Lewiston? not because of the sewer system, or new pool. No new houses because NO NEW JOBS! "

Where do you all work? wrote on Jan 23, 2007 6:13 PM:

" I think I need to find a different job! Where I work all the co-workers are held accountable and reviewed. Some have even been placed on a one year probation. So why should city employees be held any different? Wow maybe I should apply for a city job and do whatever I want when I want to do it! "

Only 3 hours! wrote on Jan 23, 2007 6:08 PM:

" It only took the new council 3 hours to hash out the old business left from our past mayor? Wow I would of guessed it would of taken lots longer, he left a lot of unfinished stuff! "

resident cont'd wrote on Jan 23, 2007 6:03 PM:

" The old council tried to do many things but 2 of the council people stopped all. The old council was all in favor of backing the new pool with the committee, but the new council says no to the pool and the library. I watch the meetings too and you can take them anyway you want, I am just more positive about our town than you. "

resident wrote on Jan 23, 2007 6:03 PM:

" yes Lewiston is okay, there is money to do the HJ project, except the new council people don't want to spend any, the projects were bid and ready to go but was stalled by two council people and now it will be even more expensive to do this. If the council is saying they do not get reports, then how do they know we can't afford it. Yes we do need new streets, but remember it was bid out and ready to go but a group of citizens said no...now it will be twice as much..remember the Big Dig. It would now be done! "

Longtime Lewiston Resident wrote on Jan 23, 2007 6:01 PM:

" I say we re-call all the elected officials in Lewiston and get people in here that are worth writing letters over. Hint: Maybe younger and better educated people that can govern city issues. LEADERS! "

Bills wrote on Jan 23, 2007 5:58 PM:

" Didn't we go through this already? The city of Lewiston was sent a bill from a local business and no city worker new anything about the charge. Most of us are held accountable at our jobs, why should city workers have it any different? This is a no-brainer unless there is stuff going down that people are trying to hide????? "

To Dagwood Comment: wrote on Jan 23, 2007 5:54 PM:

" How about the city bills you directly for the sander? Maybe you think this is the kind of government we should have in Lewiston. You place the price of a NEW sander at the same level as a nut and bolt? Yes there should be, and for the record there already is, an account for the city workers to go get low dollar items at the local hardware store. So I ask again, do you want the price of a new sander build to you directly or do you feel that there needs to be accountability in this city? There is a reason for a mayor and councilmen, and this is one of them! "

Concerned Resident of Lewiston wrote on Jan 23, 2007 5:45 PM:

" This is a very unfortunate situation that the city has gotten it's self into AGAIN. The current "soon to be former city administrator" didn't get a fair chance to administer her ideas and goals for the city. It sounds like too me that the only people that should be leaving is the current city council members. They obviously don't have a clue on how to manage the city. I admire Spitzer for leaving! I wouldn't want to work with the current board. "

Dagwood wrote on Jan 23, 2007 5:22 PM:

" When are we going to make progress instead of going backwards? Can we start by looking foward instead of putting the blame on past councils. We need to tackle the issues at hand. We have a good group of city works. lets not run them out! The last 2 snow falls our streets were plowed, even though they had to work long hours to do this. Does anyone take this into consideration, or is there still some that think they are worthless,and need to bicker at everything they do? The sander issue, do you want your streets sanded or not, or do you think equipment lasts forever? Get a clue! There is or should be an account for things like this[screws,oil lawn mower blades, etc.] "

To Resident wrote on Jan 23, 2007 2:34 PM:

" Lewiston is doing okay? Where have you been? The waste plant can NOT function properly if a local business conintues to send chemicals that degrade the system. We need money to prevent this from continueing right? We DO NOT have the money to direct the lines properly to keep the chemicals from going to the plant. Lewiston doesn't have the money to finish roads in town that we said we would by now. We don't have money to repair BAD streets in town, or build a new pool, we can't even keep the pool we got now heated properly to get kids to go swimming. So you feel Lewiston is okay? I guess I have a different definition of okay than you do! "

From Someone who Cares wrote on Jan 23, 2007 11:01 AM:

" This whole issue is very unfortunate and should never have happened. The city council and mayor need to work together and with the city employees to begin heading in the right direction. Pointing fingers and trying to dictate will only make things worse. There is a group that needs to decide if they want to help or stop being part of the problem. Give the employees the direction they need and let them get their jobs done. Look at the big picture. "

resident 3 wrote on Jan 23, 2007 10:35 AM:

" We have great local people working for our city, but they are being harrassed at every turn, councils put people in position so that they don't have to micromanage everything, which is what they are presently trying to do, get off of their back, they are honest, trustworthy people. "

resident 2 wrote on Jan 23, 2007 10:31 AM:

" Someone posted before that if all these Administrators and clerks have quit since the last election, and the problem hasn't been solved I think the last elected councilmen should look directly in the mirror, and realize they are the problem. "

RE: To All wrote on Jan 23, 2007 10:29 AM:

" Yes there were times I to have walked into the city office and saw the billing clerk listing to the radio or whatever. I also have seen on many occasions the Ambulance Director talking non-business with one of her other ambulance crew members in the office. People need to remember that we all need to get along and not be trying to personally attack each other. Political slandering of city employees and council should be left out of issues about our city. "

resident wrote on Jan 23, 2007 10:28 AM:

" I think that Lewiston has been doing okay. We have a new sewer plant, regardless of what is said here, the state said we could not hook up one more new house to the old system, thanks to that council they had to take the issue head on, also Lewiston has a new city hall, which was sorely needed, a nice main street and new parks and money in the bank, why do the writers here think Lewiston is broke, it is not, the previous council with previous administrators made sure of that. If you want to complain, step up to the plate and run, it is just a shame with all the good people in town that there wasn't a contest in this last election. "

RE: To All wrote on Jan 23, 2007 9:45 AM:

" If everyone would think of the issues at hand and not who is doing what or where. We all know the job gets done by the police department and the city seems to get our bills out in a timely manner. I recall a time when our previous deputy clerk and administrator did not seem to care if residents had proper paper work for permits or if bills were paid on time to our city. I personally appreciate the fact that our admistrator understands finacials and bookeeping unlike the council who does not know how to even read a budget report. Maybe our new council should take classes and learn how to ethically run a city. "

The real Dagwood wrote on Jan 23, 2007 8:05 AM:

" City administator is a hire position, is it not? Well who in there right mind would work 40 hours a week and then be expected to be at all these commity meetings after hours and not be compensated? Ms. Spitzer should've got some comp time instead of everyone breathing down her neck and if we can't trust our employees, well then who do we get? Remember Ms.Spitzer didn't get a bad review, she got it exstended.The city council does not know how to handle employees! They do know how to shuffle papers! "

whatever wrote on Jan 23, 2007 8:03 AM:

" It took 3 hours to hash things out and make it right?!!!!haha, it was 3 hours of shuffling papers, when they should have come prepared, besides they had held their meeting before the actual legal meeting,and they should have been able to zip right through it with their already made decisions, of course they had to pretend that they were hashing things out. "

Holly wrote on Jan 23, 2007 5:45 AM:

" I take pride in our Ambulance Service, volunteers, and City. Serving the community of Lewiston and caring for our citizens is my job in EMS - now let me stick to it. I am not "moving in" anywhere. "

re DAGWOOD Cont 2 wrote on Jan 23, 2007 4:54 AM:

" to music and watching videos on the computer. Do we need a full-time ambulance director, what does she do all day?? and what abut our police chief, I didn't know we paid cops to sit around all day either in the office or at home, I thought they were to serve and protect - can't protect from the office. Maybe we should look at the rest of the employees so we can cut spending for the street project, sewer project, swimming pool, safety equipment for park rec. HHHMMMMMMM. I do agree the council meetings on Main Street have to stop... If you want to run the city, run for council. "

re DAGWOOD Cont 1 wrote on Jan 23, 2007 4:53 AM:

" The council we have to nearly 3 hours to hash things over and get things straight, it's about time we have a working council and things will get ugly but down the road I think we will finally have a better lewiston. Someone should sit down and talk to Ms. Spitzer, maybe she took too much vacation,paid for $2500 sanders and what about the lunch periods she was allowing employees to have that were paid and not supposed to be - did you not watch the council meeting???? When you make $50000 a year doesn't mean you can work 30 hours a week and not 40, you check to see how often those employees are there. The next to cut should be the guy who bought the sander and cut that utilities clerk to half time. Everytime I go to City Hall she is listening "

re: DAGWOOD wrote on Jan 23, 2007 4:52 AM:

" When is Holly moving in DAGWOOD? I didn't know she was qualified for that position, I think she is the ambulance director if I am correct, I am sure in that job description (if there is one) there isn't any type of requirement to know accounting. If you also will take note Mr. Kanz has not as of yet made a motion when the ambulance has made a request, it would be in his best interest not to, is that not common sense, however when you live in a small community you are going to work with relatives or for relatives somewhere, I work for my relatives now. Before anyone goes blaming people, they better look at the past council, the current administrator may have resigned due to the current council, but the other two employees resigned due to the past council. "

Thanks Goodview wrote on Jan 23, 2007 1:39 AM:

" Thanks for the offer Goodview, but no thanks, we have already gone through that issue with a past administrator and clerk. "

Can't anyone get along? wrote on Jan 22, 2007 11:53 PM:

" So if you don't live in this little old town anymore and its not your tax dollars being wasted, why do you care who gets along with who? "

Lewiston Resident wrote on Jan 22, 2007 11:40 PM:

" First and foremost how could anyone, good or bad, take care of issues within Lewiston? When past city council members voted to spend money that we didn't have in the bank account. If you watched the meetings when council members admitted to writing checks without knowing what was in their account, these are the people we had writing checks for the city of Lewiston. So beat up Ahrens when he wants to know the funds before spending more money, and who sounds like they live in the stone age? I think this is just another example of who is looking out for the community of Lewiston! "

To the LEWISTON RESIDENT wrote on Jan 22, 2007 11:33 PM:

" Who do you believe the city council should answer to? If its not the residents of Lewiston than there is the problem. If Ahrens isn't looking out for the community of Lewiston, who was and is? Mr Engrave? Mr. Sommers? I think not. Lewiston didn't outgrow those ponds, Lewiston didn't maintain the integrity of the walls on the west sides and they failed allowing untreated waste to enter the nearby sink hole, this brought in the MPCA! The city council didn't research ALL of the options before going forward with millions of tax payer dollars! "

Blonde wrote on Jan 22, 2007 9:39 PM:

" Since when did Lewiston get a "City council comprehensive planning commity"? Maybe it was put in play at the New City Hall on Main Street and Who are the new MEMBERS? [I think we all know] "

Cant Anyone get along anymore for the better? wrote on Jan 22, 2007 9:33 PM:

" As Growing up in lewiston for the 1st 27 years of my life before moving away, I feel bad that My little old City has sunken to such lows. It seems that everyone around Lewiston wants to be the person of power of the city and taking states in whats right for their Sides, and not whats best for the City and the People. There should be a lot of shame weather from ex- council members or Extending ones now. my question Why the Extension? I'm listening? Who does the city council have waiting to replace the current Administrator? Lewsiton needs to join together and quit fighting one another. Whats wrong with everyone! "

DAGWOOD wrote on Jan 22, 2007 9:27 PM:

" Two questions. When did Lewiston city hall move back to main street? and when does Holly make the move? "

Lewiston resident wrote on Jan 22, 2007 9:06 PM:

" If anyone has been reading the council notes or watching it on TV, they would know that Ahrens should have left the counsel a long time ago. The city outgrew those ponds many years ago and it was time to upgrade. I am hopeful the two new counsel members will help to resolve problems (if the two old ones will finally let this happen). "

where? wrote on Jan 22, 2007 7:03 PM:

" "It was made public and televised." when and where? please elaborate... "

Re: People of Lewiston wrote on Jan 22, 2007 6:57 PM:

" Your point was wasted about Ahrens comments about past Mayor Engrave when you made negative comments about what year he is living in. I feel that the majority of Lewiston would like more accountability and responsibility when taxes are going up and we are getting what in return? Lewiston needs more Ahrens on the council, we need our city employees held responsible and accountable for there comments and actions. Lewiston drilled a new well thats to small to feed the city so now we mix from two separate wells, our treatment plant just started working correctly how many years after completion? Maybe we should of investigated lining our old ponds before spending millions in a subpar plant? One bad decision after another with our old MAYOR and council. Give the new mayor and council a chance before jumping down their throats. "

rfa wrote on Jan 22, 2007 6:00 PM:

" We know who's next. Don't we? Also got an idea who's taking Debs place. Right. Won't have to move too far. Any conflict of interest with the council? "

RE: Truth and Action wrote on Jan 22, 2007 3:54 PM:

" Did you see her review? It was made public and televised. The ONLY reason given for the extension of her probation was because three of the council members had not worked with her yet. Although they had been elected in Feb and one of them is the Fire Chief and all had the opportunity to go to City Hall and familiarize themselves with the city if this was an issue. As far as the poster calling the administrator worthless. Why is it then that no one on the council had anything to say about her work habits during her review. Three City employees in one year. I don't think the employees have been the problems. When you get rid of the people and the presumed problem remains you have to start to look at ones making the unsubstantiated accusations. "

re: Akmehd wrote on Jan 22, 2007 3:35 PM:

" Lewiston has a Subway... OF COURSE they're a city. "

I agree... wrote on Jan 22, 2007 3:16 PM:

" that there is probably more to the story but something is wrong that 3 people have resigned in a year. I also question why only one person ran for Mayor and that did not give people a choice. Of course the only person to run is going to get the job as Mayor. If there had been some competition it would have been a different story. I don't feel the Mayor knows what he is doing or where to begin to deal with things in Lewiston. Good luck Lewiston! "

Truth & Action wrote on Jan 22, 2007 1:10 PM:

" I find that this article, as informational as it may be, seems to be misleading. I think that there are more reasons as to why Ms. Spitzer has remained on probationary terms for this time. Before we form opinions about this situation, one needs to get ALL of the necessary facts. "

K wrote on Jan 22, 2007 12:34 PM:

" Perhaps their first mistake was electing "Mayor Rain" "

resident wrote on Jan 22, 2007 12:25 PM:

" Its about time. This adminstrator is worthless,she has failed to do what the council has asked her to do. "

??? wrote on Jan 22, 2007 12:22 PM:

" Again, what's next? "

people of Lewiston wrote on Jan 22, 2007 9:40 AM:

" Mr. mayor you should think it is a big deal.3 people resigning in one year tellsme somthing is wrong.Councilman Ahrens, is the how you will deal with things,blame the former mayor for your lack of common sense? We live in the year 2007 not 1907. The people of Lewiston need good people on our council not one's that blame others fo nothing getting done. What has the council accoplished since the last election? As far as i can see,only good people resigning. To bad some councilman dont resing so the town can move forward. "

Akmehd wrote on Jan 22, 2007 8:18 AM:

" Since when did Lewiston become a city? "

Treat people fairly wrote on Jan 22, 2007 7:16 AM:

" Set your priorities straight!! If the mayor has his own agenda in office, let's get it all on paper. People like to know where and how they stand. Mayor Rain and council members, Put the shoe on the other foot and see how it fits!! "

hey.......... wrote on Jan 22, 2007 1:54 AM:

" Can we try to get someone to plow the roads in Winona? I mean seriously I read all the time about how many people get alternate side parking tickets when we have no snow. Yet the roads can't be plowed. Where does this money go? "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Winona Daily News.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post. Send comments to jerome.christenson@lee.net

We reserve the right not to post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
Log In - If you have already signed up with winonadailynews.com, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, winonadailynews.com requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

WINONA JOBS

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes


 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Jobs

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises
Minnesota Farm Guide

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 The Winona Daily News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.